HoopInsider_Cooper Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 Lindy's SLC West 1. SHSU 2. TAMU-CC 3. UTSA 4. UTA 5. Lamar 6. Texas State SLC East 1. SELA 2. Nicholls State 3. NW State 4. SFA 5. McNeese State 6. Central Ark Player of the Year: Kevin Palmer, TAMU-CC Newcomer: Corey Garrett, SFA Best Shooter: Corey Allmond, SHSU Playmaker: William Mosley, NW St Defender: Devin Gibson, UTSA Versatile: Kevin Palmer, TAMU-CC NBA Prospect: Marquez Haynes, UTA Athlon SLC West 1. SHSU 2. TAMU-CC 3. UTSA 4. UTA 5. Texas State 6. Lamar SLC East 1. Nicholls State 2. SFA 3. SELA 4. NW State 5. McNeese State 6. Central Ark Player of the Year: Kevin Palmer, TAMU-CC
Guest coachacola Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 Lindy's must not like SFA since they are not included in their rankings.
LUFAN Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 God they have no faith in this years team... hopefully that is a good thing! Who knows
Guest coachacola Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 I doubt these are in-depth evaluations of the teams, just your basic glance to see who's returning from last year and rank'em that way. I wouldn't be surprised if these were done before they knew the full rosters of the teams. Rivals has LU ranked around 290 out of all the 350 some-odd D1 teams.
becktobigs Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 These magazines (and the people of this board, for that matter) didn't know who was on the team when they were putting together the lists. When the recruiting class isn't announced until after school starts, one of the consequences is low rankings.
LUFAN Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 well hopefully we do not suck that bad. 290 out of 350 we only have one way to go and that is UP.... I hope...
AggiesAreWe Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 well hopefully we do not suck that bad. 290 out of 350 we only have one way to go and that is UP.... I hope... No, you can still go 60 spots down. ;D
HoopInsider_Cooper Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Posted September 17, 2009 They have updated info and rosters but I still don't put too much into it. Thing I notice is the trend of zero respect.
Guest mffl Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Well you can't blame them if they look at last year's performance. I guess this just makes for a better surprise this year when we win the SLC. ;D
Guest coachacola Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 These predicted standings are very similar to last year's standings, with the exception of knocking SFA down a few notches. I really don't think there's much difference in talent between the teams anyway so almost any team can get hot and win conference or the SLC tourney.
LumberCard Posted September 18, 2009 Report Posted September 18, 2009 These magazines (and the people of this board, for that matter) didn't know who was on the team when they were putting together the lists. When the recruiting class isn't announced until after school starts, one of the consequences is low rankings. Those magazines DID know who was on the team. Just because it wasn't "released" to the public doesn't mean the magazines didn't get the roster from the school so they could do their publications. Happens all the time. Honestly though, the rankings don't mean squat.
Recommended Posts