smitty Posted September 16, 2009 Report Posted September 16, 2009 Offense AVG. Vidor 494 Livingston 409 Lumberton 317 PN-G 315 Central 283 Nederland 239 LC-M 206 Ozen 174 Defense Avg. Vidor 196 PN-G 229 LC-M 240 Livingston 240 Lumberton 267 Central 271 Ozen 306 Nederland 380
adminbaberuth Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 turnover png t 10 lum t 4 cen t 4 lcm t 2 liv t 1 vid - 1 oze - 4 ned - 5 rushing harmon png 365 tate vid 330 pittman vid 315 peevy vid 311 jackson liv 280 passing hughes lum 464 doty png 453 wilkerson cen 312 gonzales lcm 196 dozier vid 192 receiving deron png 234 brady ned 112 sullivan oze 103 anderson oze 113 sonnier lcm 69 draw cen 63 salenga ned 62
adminbaberuth Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 What stands out? PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300.
smitty Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Posted September 17, 2009 Again, until Vidor plays better competition, those numbers are suspect. PN-G on the other hand has played against decent opposition. So there numbers are more impressive. What stands out? PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300.
pirate68 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Again, until Vidor plays better competition, those numbers are suspect. PN-G on the other hand has played against decent opposition. So there numbers are more impressive. What stands out? PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300. Have you seen Vidor Play smitty
NDNTime Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 I don't care who Vidor has played. 3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive. It shows the options that they have.
BORAM Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Receiving numbers aren't right. How can Lumberton's Hughes be the top passer but not have one receiver in the top. Anyways, I for one don't care about stats at all. The only stat I watch is the number in the W column!
AggiesAreWe Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Receiving numbers aren't right. How can Lumberton's Hughes be the top passer but not have one receiver in the top. Anyways, I for one don't care about stats at all. The only stat I watch is the number in the W column! Yep, the Snooze's stats don't add up.
NDN79 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 W's over stat.'s any day! The stat.'s are great for the players--but the W's are what matter the most!
Foyce Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 I don't care who Vidor has played. 3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive. It shows the options that they have. Thanks NDN good comments! ;D
BMTSoulja1 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 turnover png t 10 lum t 4 cen t 4 lcm t 2 liv t 1 vid - 1 oze - 4 ned - 5 rushing harmon png 365 tate vid 330 pittman vid 315 peevy vid 311 jackson liv 280 passing hughes lum 464 doty png 453 wilkerson cen 312 gonzales lcm 196 dozier vid 192 receiving deron png 234 brady ned 112 sullivan oze 103 anderson oze 113 sonnier lcm 69 draw cen 63 salenga ned 62 We don't have a player named Draw...
NDNTime Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 I don't care who Vidor has played. 3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive. It shows the options that they have. Thanks NDN good comments! ;D I'm not going to lie. I'm biased towards my team, but I respect what you guys are doing over in Vidor. Running the ball is what ya'll do, and ya'll seem to do it pretty darn well. It is going to be fun when we hook up with you guys at the Reservation this year. It'll be two completely different styles of offense, but when executed right, both offenses create excitement.
Guest #1raider Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 turnover png t 10 lum t 4 cen t 4 lcm t 2 liv t 1 vid - 1 oze - 4 ned - 5 rushing harmon png 365 tate vid 330 pittman vid 315 peevy vid 311 jackson liv 280 passing hughes lum 464 doty png 453 wilkerson cen 312 gonzales lcm 196 dozier vid 192 receiving deron png 234 brady ned 112 sullivan oze 103 anderson oze 113 sonnier lcm 69 draw cen 63 salenga ned 62 Keith lum 220 plus deron only has 216
WTB Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Im no Vidor fan but I attended the scrimmage against WOS and they ran OVER WOS and I dont care that it was a scrimmage. It was impressive.
pngfan66 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Wow +10 for PNG in turnovers. Also looks like PNG has a very balanced offensive attack. What the heck are you guys in Vidor doing ? Thats alot of yards for rushing with 3 backs. Great Job. I think the rest of the state had better take a hard look at our district and realize that we are all on the upswing and making a come back as very strong competitors ! The playoffs this year, regardless of who goes will be good for 20-4A !!!!
Guest pirates Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 I don't care who Vidor has played. 3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive. It shows the options that they have. Thanks NDNTime. You may be the "classiest" person on this board.... ;D
smitty Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Posted September 17, 2009 No. But I know who they have and haven't played. If they can gain 400 yards against, say, Central or PN-G, then I will be the first to say they are legit. Again, until Vidor plays better competition, those numbers are suspect. PN-G on the other hand has played against decent opposition. So there numbers are more impressive. What stands out? PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300. Have you seen Vidor Play smitty
smitty Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Posted September 17, 2009 WO-S had 5 of their star players not playing in that scrimmage. Im no Vidor fan but I attended the scrimmage against WOS and they ran OVER WOS and I dont care that it was a scrimmage. It was impressive.
mlp9111 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 its amazing how the number of players that were out for that scrimmage keeps going up.... let it go....
J.R. Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 lcm defense over there is looking very stingy... Counting on they did play wos and there defense is ranked number #3 in district.
skipper Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 yep u guys did a good job on wo-s that night.BUT lets also look at it this way,the 10 grade kids did a super job agnest you also that stood there ground very good.i hate to bust your bubble my friend but the west orange bunch had 6 guys out and did not even come to that game,still a colse game with out them.like i said in a post after that night there in vidor ,i never seen a team run over 400 yards on no wo-s team end of the story i was very very pleased the way the 10 graders played agnest a huges vidor bunch best to all your guys at vidor
mlp9111 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 sorry, didnt realize we were playing the jv, guess that explains alot ;D
77 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 Excuses Excuses I've never heard so many from a team that has yet to lose a real game this season. ;D
Slam14 Posted September 17, 2009 Report Posted September 17, 2009 yep u guys did a good job on wo-s that night.BUT lets also look at it this way,the 10 grade kids did a super job agnest you also that stood there ground very good.i hate to bust your bubble my friend but the west orange bunch had 6 guys out and did not even come to that game,still a colse game with out them.like i said in a post after that night there in vidor ,i never seen a team run over 400 yards on no wo-s team end of the story i was very very pleased the way the 10 graders played agnest a huges vidor bunch best to all your guys at vidor I'm afraid that may not be the only bubble that is burst before the year is up. Unless wos dresses out players that are not listed on their roster, LCM has more varsity Sophomores than wos.
Recommended Posts