20-4A Stats For 9-16-09.

[smitty]

                      Offense

                        AVG.

Vidor                494

Livingston          409

Lumberton          317

PN-G                315

Central              283

Nederland          239

LC-M                206

Ozen                174

                      Defense

                      Avg.

Vidor              196

PN-G              229

LC-M              240

Livingston        240

Lumberton        267

Central            271

Ozen              306

Nederland        380

[adminbaberuth]

turnover

png    t 10

lum    t 4

cen    t 4

lcm    t 2

liv    t 1

vid    - 1

oze    - 4

ned    - 5

rushing

harmon  png  365

tate    vid  330

pittman  vid  315

peevy    vid  311

jackson  liv  280

passing

hughes    lum    464

doty      png    453

wilkerson  cen    312

gonzales  lcm    196

dozier    vid    192

receiving

deron    png    234

brady    ned    112

sullivan  oze    103

anderson  oze    113

sonnier  lcm    69

draw      cen    63

salenga  ned    62

[adminbaberuth]

What stands out?

PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300.

[smitty]

Again, until Vidor plays better competition, those numbers are suspect. 

PN-G on the other hand has played against decent opposition.  So there numbers are more impressive.

What stands out?

PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300.

[mlp9111]

keep telling yourself that.....

[pirate68]

Again, until Vidor plays better competition, those numbers are suspect.  

PN-G on the other hand has played against decent opposition.  So there numbers are more impressive.

What stands out?

PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300.

Have you seen Vidor Play smitty

[NDNTime]

I don't care who Vidor has played.  3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive.  It shows the options that they have.

[BORAM]

Receiving numbers aren't right. How can Lumberton's Hughes be the top passer but not have one receiver in the top. Anyways, I for one don't care about stats at all. The only stat I watch is the number in the W column!

[AggiesAreWe]

Receiving numbers aren't right. How can Lumberton's Hughes be the top passer but not have one receiver in the top. Anyways, I for one don't care about stats at all. The only stat I watch is the number in the W column!

Yep, the Snooze's stats don't add up.

[NDN79]

W's over stat.'s any day! The stat.'s are great for the players--but the W's are what matter the most!

[Foyce]

I don't care who Vidor has played.  3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive.  It shows the options that they have.

Thanks NDN good comments!  ;D

[BMTSoulja1]

turnover

png    t 10

lum    t 4

cen    t 4

lcm    t 2

liv    t 1

vid    - 1

oze    - 4

ned    - 5

rushing

harmon   png   365

tate     vid   330

pittman  vid   315

peevy    vid   311

jackson  liv   280

passing

hughes     lum    464

doty       png    453

wilkerson  cen    312

gonzales   lcm    196

dozier     vid    192

receiving

deron     png     234

brady     ned     112

sullivan  oze     103

anderson  oze     113

sonnier   lcm     69

draw      cen    63

salenga   ned     62

We don't have a player named Draw...

[NDNTime]

I don't care who Vidor has played.  3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive.  It shows the options that they have.

Thanks NDN good comments!  ;D

I'm not going to lie.  I'm biased towards my team, but I respect what you guys are doing over in Vidor.  Running the ball is what ya'll do, and ya'll seem to do it pretty darn well.  It is going to be fun when we hook up with you guys at the Reservation this year.  It'll be two completely different styles of offense, but when executed right, both offenses create excitement.

[Guest #1raider]

turnover

png    t 10

lum    t 4

cen    t 4

lcm    t 2

liv    t 1

vid    - 1

oze    - 4

ned    - 5

rushing

harmon   png   365

tate     vid   330

pittman  vid   315

peevy    vid   311

jackson  liv   280

passing

hughes     lum    464

doty       png    453

wilkerson  cen    312

gonzales   lcm    196

dozier     vid    192

receiving

deron     png     234

brady     ned     112

sullivan  oze     103

anderson  oze     113

sonnier   lcm     69

draw      cen     63

salenga   ned     62

Keith lum 220

plus deron only has 216

[WTB]

Im no Vidor fan but I attended the scrimmage against WOS and they ran OVER WOS and I dont care that it was a scrimmage. It was impressive.

[pngfan66]

Wow +10 for PNG in turnovers.  Also looks like PNG has a very balanced offensive attack.  What the heck are you guys in Vidor doing ? Thats alot of yards for rushing with 3 backs.  Great Job. I think the rest of the state had better take a hard look at our district and realize that we are all on the upswing and making a come back as very strong competitors !  The playoffs this year, regardless of who goes will be good for 20-4A !!!! 

[Guest pirates]

I don't care who Vidor has played.  3 rushers with 300+ yards in three games is impressive.  It shows the options that they have.

Thanks NDNTime.

You may be the  "classiest" person on this board.... ;D

[smitty]

No.  But I know who they have and haven't played.  If they can gain 400 yards against, say, Central or PN-G, then I will be the first to say they are legit.

Again, until Vidor plays better competition, those numbers are suspect.  

PN-G on the other hand has played against decent opposition.  So there numbers are more impressive.

What stands out?

PNG plus 10 turnover ratio and Vidor's 3 rushers over 300.

Have you seen Vidor Play smitty

[smitty]

WO-S had 5 of their star players not playing in that scrimmage. 

Im no Vidor fan but I attended the scrimmage against WOS and they ran OVER WOS and I dont care that it was a scrimmage. It was impressive.

[mlp9111]

its amazing how the number of players that were out for that scrimmage keeps going up.... let it go....

[J.R.]

lcm defense over there is looking very stingy...

Counting on they did play wos and there defense is ranked number #3 in district.

[skipper]

yep u guys did a good job on wo-s that night.BUT lets also look at it this way,the 10 grade kids did a super job agnest you also that stood there ground very good.i hate to bust your bubble my friend but the west orange bunch had  6 guys out and did not even come to that game,still a colse game with out them.like i said in a post after that night there in vidor ,i never seen a team  run over 400 yards on no wo-s team end of the story i was very very pleased the way the  10 graders played agnest a huges  vidor bunch best to all your guys at vidor

[mlp9111]

sorry, didnt realize we were playing the jv, guess that explains alot ;D

[77]

Excuses Excuses I've never heard so many from a team that has yet to lose a real game this season. ;D

[Slam14]

yep u guys did a good job on wo-s that night.BUT lets also look at it this way,the 10 grade kids did a super job agnest you also that stood there ground very good.i hate to bust your bubble my friend but the west orange bunch had  6 guys out and did not even come to that game,still a colse game with out them.like i said in a post after that night there in vidor ,i never seen a team  run over 400 yards on no wo-s team end of the story i was very very pleased the way the  10 graders played agnest a huges  vidor bunch best to all your guys at vidor

I'm afraid that may not be the only bubble that is burst before the year is up.

Unless wos dresses out players that are not listed on their roster, LCM has more varsity Sophomores than wos.