ALLABOUTSTATE4BC09 Posted October 3, 2009 Report Posted October 3, 2009 I think last year BC just thought HJ would lay down and let them win because they got rocked by a hurricane? Idk what happened but I was looking at the stats from last years game and HJ didn't overly dominate BC, Can anyone that was at the game last year explain how HJ kept scoring? I think this year BC will come out more focused and wins by 6 at home...
Hupernikomen Posted October 3, 2009 Report Posted October 3, 2009 I think it is a toss up and will knock out whoever losses from contention for a playoff spot. BC should have a slight edge with it being at home.
Lazeek Posted October 3, 2009 Report Posted October 3, 2009 If both teams show up and play to their potential it will be a great game. I will take the Hawks 21-20.
33 Posted October 3, 2009 Report Posted October 3, 2009 I think last year BC just thought HJ would lay down and let them win because they got rocked by a hurricane? Idk what happened but I was looking at the stats from last years game and HJ didn't overly dominate BC, Can anyone that was at the game last year explain how HJ kept scoring? I think this year BC will come out more focused and wins by 6 at home... it was the big plays... BC hasn't been able to eliminate the big plays the last few years...
Png1209 Posted October 4, 2009 Report Posted October 4, 2009 Hawks by 14......BC hasn't proven anything yet
braves24 Posted October 4, 2009 Report Posted October 4, 2009 Hawks by 14......BC hasn't proven anything yet They haven't?
Anafanatic Posted October 4, 2009 Report Posted October 4, 2009 HJ - 30 BC - 26 Good luck to both squads!
venom33 Posted October 4, 2009 Report Posted October 4, 2009 Hawks by 14......BC hasn't proven anything yet They haven't? seriously what have they proven? that they can infact beat teams like kelly,kountze,buna,and liberty they just cant stop these powerhouses from scoring? the only decent team theyve played they got beat by!
Png1209 Posted October 4, 2009 Report Posted October 4, 2009 BC problem is that they run an offense they doesnt suit their kids and their past records show that. They have one of the best running backs in the area. If they went under center and ran a proset with a tightend i think it would be harder to stop them. You can still have multi reciever sets with a three to five step drop but also have that extra lineman to block on runs and go out on passes. Stump is a good coach i just think when he came from West Brook under his brother he thought that same offense would work at BC. They dont have the same kids or numbers. Just my opinion.
Recommended Posts