33 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 but you've got to realize WHO you were playing to determine HOW you played the game that way... Yes..... I knew that, sooner or later, your constant rant to try and down play anything WOS does would lead you to making this statement. Now... take this statement and apply it to every win BC has this year (I throw out the HJ game because a wet field tends to be an equalizer)... it really isn't that im trying to down play everything WOS does... they are a good football team... it's just i get tired of seeing posts all about how WOS will roll in the district and go into the playoffs and blah blah blah, you know the rest of the story... seems that they just over look every team they play except for silsbee and expect to go undefeated in district every year and when they dont a few fans make excuses for the loss before they say great job on the win... but when WOS beat HF people said they turned around which is a ridiculous statement... you cant say your team is turned around on someone thats not a threat... not trying to take the win away from them or anything, but you cant just say your going to roll over everyone now that you had a big number on the score board vs a down team... 33, you have been wrong with every prediction you have made so far, and this won will be your worst, thinking that your cardinals have a chance against the mustangs are rediculous, no matter how good ya'll did against silsbee. LCM beat silsbee in a scrimmage, yet they lost to WOS. So past games don't matter at all. Yes WOS hasn't done too great this season, but an average WOS team is far above a good BC one. lol lcm "beat" silsbee in a SCRIMMAGE thats exactly what it was... a SCRIMMAGE... and the think BC cant hang with anyone in the district is ridiculous... i didn't say BC can't hang with "anyone", just not WOSÂ ;D people also said that we wouldn't hang with HJ... we beat them... people didn't think we could hang with Silsbee... lost by 7... tight game the whole time...
magnus1on1 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Sil and Wos played on a wet field.. The outcome could have been different if it were on a dry field.. Just saying.. BC and Wos are different teams they match up is differently I think that WOS is going to win.. It's going be close in the first half then wos will walk away in the second... Turnovers will matter Huge in the first half...
the-riot07 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Looks like the weather friday is supposed to be just as nice as this past friday so the weather wont play a part in this game and we will get to see the real talent of these two teams!
KFDM COOP Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Right now the Weather looks fine, but one model we having is showing rain!!
33 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Right now the Weather looks fine, but one model we having is showing rain!! hopefully it doesn't rain... when BC wins i dont want you bashing the rain for the loss...
KFDM COOP Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Â I want it dry as well, anyone can win in the rain and slop.
33 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Â I want it dry as well, anyone can when in the rain and slop. nah, just whoever wants it more!Â
Cardinal Supporter Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 Boy, where to begin. Even though I am a Bridge City fan I am wanting to comment on both sides of the fans. First of all 33 speaks for himself. I don't know the poster but I don't like the smack talk he is doing. It just riles up the other side. WOS is a good football team and it will be hard for BC to win the game. I think BC can win but I would have to have physic powers to know what will happen. BC is playing the best football it has played in the last three years and WOS is probably playing the worst it has in the past three years. But the stats are still in WOS's favor. I think they will win but the game will be hard fought on both sides and WOS will have to play hard to win. I think WOS is badly mistaken and trying to fool themselves if they think that they would have beaten Silsbee on a dry field. WOS you only had about 65 yards total offense during the game where Silsbee had 180+ yards I think. With that kind of offensive output you were lucky they did not score more. On a dry field Silsbee still wins in my opinion. WOS fans said after the Brookshire Royal win that they turned it around and were now playing like the Mustangs could. It seems like everytime you win you think that the team has turned it around. WOS has a lot of young inexperienced players this year. I think they will be better next year but accept it. They may win out the rest of the year or not. If they do they probably will not go very far in the playoffs, but again I would have to have some kind of physic powers to see into the future to know that. If BC gets into the playoffs they may go a round or two, it depends on who they face. I predict WOS capable of winning by 1 or 2 TD's. Weather they play well enough to will be seen Friday night.
adminbaberuth Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 I'm thinking this district is starting to look like baseball. WOS hasn't lost any talent, the other schools have started to play more competitive football.
bone Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 I'm thinking this district is starting to look like baseball. WOS hasn't lost any talent, the other schools have started to play more competitive football. I belive your right
skipper Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 good post BC fan, but i dont agree with you on the silsbee game dry field diffrent story. u said the tigers had all those yards BUT ONLY 13 points hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm why was that. silsbee won its history
33 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Posted October 18, 2009 good post BC fan, but i dont agree with you on the silsbee game dry field diffrent story. u said the tigers had all those yards BUT ONLY 13 points hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm why was that. silsbee won its history how would it be a different story??? both teams had to go through the same playing conditions!! you cant say a team would have beat another if it wasn't a wet field! BOTH teams played in the same weather and on the SAME field!! get over yourselves...
braves24 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 Yeah Im not a big fan on that field condition stuff, They both have to play on the same field.
hj_hawk_60 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 They do have to play on the same field, but if your offensive strength is quick athletes who run and cut and aren't able to do that on a wet field then it can affect your game.
33 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 They do have to play on the same field, but if your offensive strength is quick athletes who run and cut and aren't able to do that on a wet field then it can affect your game. they are both speed teams... it'd affect them both the same! go figure...
CATS80 Posted October 19, 2009 Author Report Posted October 19, 2009 I would say it affects a passing team alot more than a running team  now who disagrees with that.
skipper Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 i agree . JJ had two long runs he is the best around hands down
33 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 I would say it affects a passing team alot more than a running team  now who disagrees with that. and silsbee won! wow, i guess that means they would have won by alot more??
skipper Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 wow ,maybe its past your bed time u got school tomorrow night night
33 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Posted October 19, 2009 wow ,maybe its past your bed time u got school tomorrow night night sounds like you need to go back to school or you shouldn't have dropped out so soon...
Recommended Posts