Jump to content

Weird Calls

no-look

By no-look
in SETXsports Archived Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

no-look

no-look

Posted
Posted
Seen some strange ones this week.....I have the highest reguard for a good ref. There are some good ones out there that bring class and stability to the game but I guess a few are just learning..........team A fouls team B... team A thens geta a tech....after much discussion team B shoots the two shot tech and they play the one and one free throw. Shouldn't they shoot the one and one, then the tech and then get the ball?...........................team A and team B are scrambling for a loose ball, no one has possession(in front of team B bench) team B coach yells time out to ref. He is awarded the time out. ball still loose on the floor. After a discussion team B gets the ball and possession arrow is changed from team A to team B........chaos...lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OLDREF

OLDREF

Posted
Posted
NO=LOOK.....VERY GOOD.....YOU ARE RIGHT IN BOTH CASES...first...if you have a foul followed by a tech....this is the order you  proceed.  if it is the 7th foul you would shootone and one....or two shots if it is a shooting foul ....or if it is a foul on a made basket then it would be one shot...followed ny two shots for thetech....after the two techs the ball is put in in the side across from the scorers table....

IN THE SECOND CASE........the official SHOULD NOT GRANT A TIMEOUT UNLESS THE BALL IS IN CONTROL OF ONE TEAM OR THE OTHER....

Would you be so kind to tell me which games these happened in,.....I need to know if they are part of our UIL CHAPTER or TASO.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
no-look

no-look

Posted
  • Author
Posted
[quote name="OLDREF" post="716031" timestamp="1258951239"]
NO=LOOK.....VERY GOOD.....YOU ARE RIGHT IN BOTH CASES...first...if you have a foul followed by a tech....this is the order you  proceed.  if it is the 7th foul you would shootone and one....or two shots if it is a shooting foul ....or if it is a foul on a made basket then it would be one shot...followed ny two shots for thetech....after the two techs the ball is put in in the side across from the scorers table....

IN THE SECOND CASE........the official SHOULD NOT GRANT A TIMEOUT UNLESS THE BALL IS IN CONTROL OF ONE TEAM OR THE OTHER....

Would you be so kind to tell me which games these happened in,.....I need to know if they are part of our UIL CHAPTER or TASO.....
[/quote]Happened in the Lufkin area....game one was a girls game  and game two was a boys....two different sets of refs.....game two,I have seen those guys before and have called at our place and done a decent job.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • weonlyrun28toss
      Pineywoods Hoopfest, Lufkin Nov. 25-26/Post updates and results here

      By weonlyrun28toss · Posted

      naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Cu Chulainn
      Orangefield 65 Livingston 83/FINAL

      By Cu Chulainn · Posted

      Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • TxHoops
      Susan Smith

      By TxHoops · Posted

      I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • setxathlete14
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

      AMEN!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...