_Alan_ Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 1. 2. png defeated 4. liberty1. 2.nederland defeated 3. livingston3.hamshire fannett defeated 2. vidor4.bmt central defeated 1. lumberton
Lumraider22 Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 well I guess that ends the argument on which district was tougher/more challenging.I bet LCM could have held their own as well if they would have made playoffs.
_Alan_ Posted March 21, 2010 Author Report Posted March 21, 2010 indeed it does, district 38 is the tougher district indeed
hj_hawk_60 Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 I guess we wont have to wait long for the District 37-4A all district
sharkfutbol Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 "I guess we wont have to wait long for the District 37-4A all district" That is funny :) :)
CoachL Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 actual ...no its not lol. :P Good luck though to our district 38 counterparts.
sharkfutbol Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 no its not funny they swept. its funny how that young man looks at it......... his only comment. is .. woo woo all district.. sorry
_Alan_ Posted March 21, 2010 Author Report Posted March 21, 2010 i think everyone did well this season but district 38 proved to be the better districthang tough though 37
hj_hawk_60 Posted March 21, 2010 Report Posted March 21, 2010 [quote name="sharkfutbol" post="779873" timestamp="1269183760"]no its not funny they swept. its funny how that young man looks at it......... his only comment. is .. woo woo all district.. sorry [/quote]i meant it jokingly.. i really wish district 37 still had some representation in the playoffs.. but congratulations to all the district 38 teams that will be representing this area in the playoffs
coach_stockmalone Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.
sharkfutbol Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 If your first and second place teams lost to third and fourth. . I doubt a couple of players missing would have made much of a difference against 1st and 2nd place teams from the district.
ForeverADog Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 [quote name="coach_stockmalone" post="780334" timestamp="1269288303"]District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.[/quote]Well sorry that District 38 has their priorities to stay home and play their games with their team instead of going on a vacation in the most critical time of the season.
Islander Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 Wow, some people think denial is only a river that flows threw Egypt.
dav-joel Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 [quote name="coach_stockmalone" post="780334" timestamp="1269288303"]District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.[/quote]Are you joking or serious? ???
dav-joel Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 [quote name="hj_hawk_60" post="779837" timestamp="1269148415"]I guess we wont have to wait long for the District 37-4A all district[/quote]Hopefully "all district" does not mean "all players in the district"
BadMedicine Posted March 22, 2010 Report Posted March 22, 2010 [quote name="coach_stockmalone" post="780334" timestamp="1269288303"]District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.[/quote]If "several starters" ::) can't show up for a once in a lifetime playoff game, those teams don't deserve to advance to the next round.
LabGeek Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 [quote name="coach_stockmalone" post="780334" timestamp="1269288303"]District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.[/quote]Why does there have to be a reason? On any given day...isn't that how the saying goes. District 38 just played the better games last week...
Bucof2010 Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 [quote name="Dav-J" post="780391" timestamp="1269297620"][quote author=coach_stockmalone link=topic=67594.msg780334#msg780334 date=1269288303]District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.[/quote]Are you joking or serious? ???[/quote]I hope he's joking
Avatar Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 [quote name="coach_stockmalone" post="780334" timestamp="1269288303"]District 38 caught District 37 during Spring Break, which was critical to their success. Liberty and Livingston were both missing several starters, which changed the whole outlook of the games. District 38 might be better, but it was more timing than talent.[/quote] thats why central was so great against lumberton. All during district they had their two best players out due to grades but it being spring break, they got those two star playets back.
Never Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 No. I [u][b]think [/b][/u]the information is not entirely correct. I know for a fact that Central was missing several "star" players the first half of district play. These players returned for the second half of district play and was a major factor in the team making it to playoffs. I do not believe there were any additional players in the playoff game that did not play the second half of district play. Then again, I could be wrong because I did not see the playoff game.
Chazz Michael Michaels Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 What numbers were these two star players, and if they couldn't keep their grades up they didn't deserve to play anyway.
Bucof2010 Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 I'm pretty sure you can't play if your failing just because its spring break
Chazz Michael Michaels Posted March 23, 2010 Report Posted March 23, 2010 [quote name="Bucof2010" post="780663" timestamp="1269360778"]I'm pretty sure you can't play if your failing just because its spring break[/quote]Yes you can, there is something wrong with UIL rules when it comes to spring break. We also had one starter this year who couldn't play because of grades, but he got to play during spring break.
Recommended Posts