Jump to content

WOS vs Dayton scrimmage updates


Recommended Posts

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827816" timestamp="1282313934"]
[quote author=BaseBow link=topic=71652.msg827812#msg827812 date=1282313734]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]WOW....  same old FW :o
[/quote]

And how did that offend you or show FW attitude?? Just used some facts and the same sarcasm on comparisions that a WOS fan used? Help me out - how did that offend you or show arrogance as you people like to stereotype any one from FW?
[/quote]Here we go :D ...Your the one getting all off in your feelins..Man you don't always have to have a chip on your shoulder...We (NEDERLAND) had dealings with you guys 2years ago in baseball ...I am not offended at all  ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827800" timestamp="1282313052"]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]

"Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD."

This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true.

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote]

You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello?

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote]

No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far?

Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest octfeb
[quote name="Gasilla" post="827910" timestamp="1282321678"]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]

"Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD."

This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true.

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote]

You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello?

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote]

No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far?

Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D



[/quote][b][color=purple][size=12pt]GO BRONCOS ;D[/size][/color][/b]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BaseBow" post="827885" timestamp="1282319177"]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827816#msg827816 date=1282313934]
[quote author=BaseBow link=topic=71652.msg827812#msg827812 date=1282313734]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]WOW....  same old FW :o
[/quote]

And how did that offend you or show FW attitude?? Just used some facts and the same sarcasm on comparisions that a WOS fan used? Help me out - how did that offend you or show arrogance as you people like to stereotype any one from FW?
[/quote]Here we go :D ...Your the one getting all off in your feelins..Man you don't always have to have a chip on your shoulder...We (NEDERLAND) had dealings with you guys 2years ago in baseball ...I am not offended at all  ;)
[/quote]

Wow Same old Nederland. We, Friendswood had dealings with yall 2 years ago in baseball and last year in football. Hope we did not hurt your feelins!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Gasilla" post="827910" timestamp="1282321678"]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]

"Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD."

This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true.

[b]I posted no excuses - just the facts - got that Gasilla. Show me where I tried to excuse Angletons performance. I know that is hard for you - but try to find some excuses. PS this was posted by another web site reporter, not a local paper![/b]

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote]

You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello?

[b]Again  - you seem to have grammar issues - show me where I said we were bigger, as fast, stronger and more disciplined? So just mentioning the characteristics of our team makes me arrogant. Of course I feel we are going to win fella, it is my team. PS - most of the setxsports fans who all just love FW also think we are going to win. But so what - we still have to play the game. PS - the purpose of these boards is to discuss - but when you cop a tude - I will get right back in your face. I assume you are an WOS fan? Have a kid playing - great - enjoy the experience and work on your post reading skills and some thicker skin.[/b]

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote]

No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far?

[b]Because we know Dayton and Angleton very well, I think Angleton is better this year - ok!!! You bring up history which has nothing to do with this year. I know the returning talend from each team, we played them both, and think Angleton has more back. Both are very good teams. Got it, simple opinion and no ones is better - not even yours, now that is arrogance!![/b]

Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D

[b]But I have said enough , I have dealt with your type so many times - you have orange colored glasses!![/b]

TOUCHE!



[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827933" timestamp="1282324025"]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827910#msg827910 date=1282321678]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]

"Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD."

This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true.

[b]I posted no excuses - just the facts - got that Gasilla. Show me where I tried to excuse Angletons performance. I know that is hard for you - but try to find some excuses. PS this was posted by another web site reporter, not a local paper![/b]

[b][i]"Angelton was very flat", "WC was pumped ", "Once Angleton got fired up", Excuses!!! And it wreaks of, "they only played better because ... (see previous excuses) which is nothing more than Homer mentality. Got that?[/i][/b]

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote]

You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello?

[b]Again  - you seem to have grammar issues - show me where I said we were bigger, as fast, stronger and more disciplined? So just mentioning the characteristics of our team makes me arrogant. Of course I feel we are going to win fella, it is my team. PS - most of the setxsports fans who all just love FW also think we are going to win. But so what - we still have to play the game. PS - the purpose of these boards is to discuss - but when you cop a tude - I will get right back in your face. I assume you are an WOS fan? Have a kid playing - great - enjoy the experience and work on your post reading skills and some thicker skin.[/b]

[b][i]Funny, you mention grammar issues but then proceed to point out nothing about grammar. Maybe the word you are looking for is "comprehension" and yes I do very well at that. Maybe you should try a little because I said on my last post that you insinuate with the things you say and the context in which you put them. It is implied... LOL Your trying awfully hard to make yourself sound intelligent, but then unwittingly discredit yourself... LOL. Tude??? Dude, you started with a tude... ;)[/i][/b]

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote]

No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far?

[b]Because we know Dayton and Angleton very well, I think Angleton is better this year - ok!!! You bring up history which has nothing to do with this year. I know the returning talend from each team, we played them both, and think Angleton has more back. Both are very good teams. Got it, simple opinion and no ones is better - not even yours, now that is arrogance!![/b]

[b][i]LOL... I did not say either one was better than the other, nor did I imply it. You were the one who stepped out there and made the statement that one was better than the other. I used a little common sense and football knowledge to discredit it. ;D[/i][/b]

Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D

[b]But I have said enough , I have dealt with your type so many times - you have orange colored glasses!![/b]

TOUCHE!



[/quote]
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Gasilla" post="827971" timestamp="1282328782"]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827933#msg827933 date=1282324025]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827910#msg827910 date=1282321678]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384]
[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556]
[quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942]
Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  
[/quote]

Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think.
[/quote]

Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
[/quote]

You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya!


PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in.

What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!!
[/quote]

"Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD."

This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true.

[b]I posted no excuses - just the facts - got that Gasilla. Show me where I tried to excuse Angletons performance. I know that is hard for you - but try to find some excuses. PS this was posted by another web site reporter, not a local paper![/b]

[b][i]"Angelton was very flat", "WC was pumped ", "Once Angleton got fired up", Excuses!!! And it wreaks of, "they only played better because ... (see previous excuses) which is nothing more than Homer mentality. Got that?[/i][/b]

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote]

You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello?

[b]Again  - you seem to have grammar issues - show me where I said we were bigger, as fast, stronger and more disciplined? So just mentioning the characteristics of our team makes me arrogant. Of course I feel we are going to win fella, it is my team. PS - most of the setxsports fans who all just love FW also think we are going to win. But so what - we still have to play the game. PS - the purpose of these boards is to discuss - but when you cop a tude - I will get right back in your face. I assume you are an WOS fan? Have a kid playing - great - enjoy the experience and work on your post reading skills and some thicker skin.[/b]

[b][i]Funny, you mention grammar issues but then proceed to point out nothing about grammar. Maybe the word you are looking for is "comprehension" and yes I do very well at that. Maybe you should try a little because I said on my last post that you insinuate with the things you say and the context in which you put them. It is implied... LOL Your trying awfully hard to make yourself sound intelligent, but then unwittingly discredit yourself... LOL. Tude??? Dude, you started with a tude... ;)[/i][/b]

[quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote]

No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far?

[b]Because we know Dayton and Angleton very well, I think Angleton is better this year - ok!!! You bring up history which has nothing to do with this year. I know the returning talend from each team, we played them both, and think Angleton has more back. Both are very good teams. Got it, simple opinion and no ones is better - not even yours, now that is arrogance!![/b]

[b][i]LOL... I did not say either one was better than the other, nor did I imply it. You were the one who stepped out there and made the statement that one was better than the other. I used a little common sense and football knowledge to discredit it. ;D[/i][/b]

Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D

[b]But I have said enough , I have dealt with your type so many times - you have orange colored glasses!![/b]

TOUCHE!

See what you started Tyrone?


[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I’m super excited for this game.  PNG has the team and game plan that will slow TH down.  No way we can stop them the entire game, but I feel if we slow them down we can win similar to what we did last year to Lake Creek and SOC.  
    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
    • Got my hotel booked...an hour away. They're having some kind of Light festival, so busy times in Nat.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...