Jump to content

Can Nederland?!


smitty

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There's not a better DC somewhere in the state of Texas?  Again, that would be left up to Neauman.  But in my opinion a change has been needed.  You obviously disagree.  State your opinion and why.


[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="847288" timestamp="1284484504"]
Change the DC to who, specifically?
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way you think!!  But that would be more in line with the HC's job.  Hummm, Dodge as our HC.  Now THAT would be a step in the right direction.    ;D  ;)


[quote name="rvbulldogs" post="847336" timestamp="1284486766"]
Todd Dodge may be looking for a new job soon.
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="smitty" post="847303" timestamp="1284485600"]
There's not a better DC somewhere in the state of Texas?  Again, that would be left up to Neauman.  But in my opinion a change has been needed.  You obviously disagree.  State your opinion and why.


[quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=72900.msg847288#msg847288 date=1284484504]
Change the DC to who, specifically?
[/quote]
[/quote]


I don't have an opinion on this matter. I just wanted to know specifically what you were alluding to.

Do you want Pate back? Is that it?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what Pate knows about being a DC since he the offensive line coach all those years. 
I had no one in specific to replace the one we got.  Just stating an opinion that a change has been needed.



[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="847354" timestamp="1284487795"]
[quote author=smitty link=topic=72900.msg847303#msg847303 date=1284485600]
There's not a better DC somewhere in the state of Texas?  Again, that would be left up to Neauman.  But in my opinion a change has been needed.  You obviously disagree.  State your opinion and why.


[quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=72900.msg847288#msg847288 date=1284484504]
Change the DC to who, specifically?
[/quote]
[/quote]


I don't have an opinion on this matter. I just wanted to know specifically what you were alluding to.

Do you want Pate back? Is that it?
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest strongend
The way to shut smitty up is to ignore his posts.  Hard to argue with yourself.  If you are lookin for a fight, he is the man.  Dont change his mind, just dont acknowledge it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, another newbie.  No fights here.  Just discussing problems as I/we see it.  Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean we can't continue to discuss.  Anyway, why are you even here if you can't handle what's being said?!    ???  ::)


[quote name="strongend" post="847504" timestamp="1284496961"]
The way to shut smitty up is to ignore his posts.  Hard to argue with yourself.  If you are lookin for a fight, he is the man.  Dont change his mind, just dont acknowledge it.
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't had a REALLY stout and legitimate defense since Mayhew, Cobb, Pilitere, etc were there. Still the same DC, Spell. Anyone can say "fire the DC" but if you go back far enough you will see that alot of the GREAT D-position coaches moved on. That may be where the problem lies. Coach Spell has had his day in the sun. His strategy versus Friendswood alone in 2001 was something to marvel at. Maybe he has lost his touch, I don't know. I haven't been there in a long while.
But one thing I do know is this...
The difference between a good defense and a bad defense is TACKLING! Fly to the stinkin ball, wrap up and drive through somebody! 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really understand all the flack Coach Spell is getting. I was told a long time ago by an old coach, "It's not about the X's and O's. It's more about the Larry's and the Joe's!"

In my opinion there is more to a great coach than just winning.(and he has done a lot of that) Coach Spell is a man with integrity and passion who teaches the kids about commitment and character. He has had some great kids play for him and come up with some great defensive schemes. He has coached through the bad times(August) and the good(Neumann). His family and faith have helped him through both those times and he sacrificed time with both to coach "The Communities Kids." I think there are a lot of men young and old who would say that Coach Spell was a man that taught them about life as well as football. I have had the privilege to coach with and against him and can only hope that my 2 sons are lucky enough to be coached by him. I don't know if you could find a better Defensive coordinator out there, [u]but I sure as heck know you could do worse![/u]

Go Dogs!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="EX-Ceauxch" post="847591" timestamp="1284503246"]
I don't really understand all the flack Coach Spell is getting. I was told a long time ago by an old coach, "It's not about the X's and O's. It's more about the Larry's and the Joe's!"

In my opinion there is more to a great coach than just winning.(and he has done a lot of that) Coach Spell is a man with integrity and passion who teaches the kids about commitment and character. He has had some great kids play for him and come up with some great defensive schemes. He has coached through the bad times(August) and the good(Neumann). His family and faith have helped him through both those times and he sacrificed time with both to coach "The Communities Kids." I think there are allot of men young and old who would say that Coach Spell was a man that taught them about life as well as football. I have had the privilege to coach with and against him and can only hope that my 2 sons are lucky enough to be coached by him. I don't know if you could find a better Defensive coordinator out there, [u]but I sure as heck know you could do worse![/u]

Go Dogs!!

[/quote]
Good Post!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...