Jump to content

Nederland vs. Livingston


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="GrayDog" post="865723" timestamp="1286222225"]
I can't believe we gotta go to Livingston again this year and listen to Reba announce football for 4 quarters - 2 years in a row...  what's up with that?  I think I would rather argue with smitty about the DC...
[/quote]

:D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We played the lions in Livingston last year and we won...in spite of Reba and being considerable underdogs at the time
and there were playoff implications for both teams....the dogs are blooming late which makes it hard for the opponents
to figure us out.....I think we'll win by two touchdowns, and it may not be the scoring fest some think it will be.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BaseBow" post="865437" timestamp="1286189508"]
I think it says alot that the run D against P.N.G held Bertrand under 100 yds..That is pretty big , I believe it is the first time this season he has been held under a 150yds...That being said a healthy Bulldog team wins ...
[/quote]
Chase Bertrand had 195 yards against Nederland
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="pngrick" post="866232" timestamp="1286267554"]
[quote author=BaseBow link=topic=73891.msg865437#msg865437 date=1286189508]
I think it says alot that the run D against P.N.G held Bertrand under 100 yds..That is pretty big , I believe it is the first time this season he has been held under a 150yds...That being said a healthy Bulldog team wins ...
[/quote]
Chase Bertrand had 195 yards against Nederland
[/quote]One paper said 200 one paper said 95 ..He did not rush for over 100 ..Watched game again last night and they said in the start of the 4th qtr he had 79 yds ....After the game they said 19 carries 95 yds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BaseBow" post="866233" timestamp="1286267988"]
[quote author=pngrick link=topic=73891.msg866232#msg866232 date=1286267554]
[quote author=BaseBow link=topic=73891.msg865437#msg865437 date=1286189508]
I think it says alot that the run D against P.N.G held Bertrand under 100 yds..That is pretty big , I believe it is the first time this season he has been held under a 150yds...That being said a healthy Bulldog team wins ...
[/quote]
Chase Bertrand had 195 yards against Nederland
[/quote]One paper said 200 one paper said 95 ..He did not rush for over 100 ..Watched game again last night and they said in the start of the 4th qtr he had 79 yds ....After the game they said 19 carries 95 yds
[/quote]

I don't think he had 196 yards, but thats what the Chronicle is saying.

http://www.chron.com/sports/highschoolsports/results.html?site=default&mkt=&Season=2010&tpl=Boxscore&Sport=1&ID=75132&TeamID=151&SearchType=Teams
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looked at the stats from the paper it list the PNG team with only 142 rushing yards total.  It does have Bertrand with 196.  The kid did great but they must have a PNG grad doing the math. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D It was a GREAT game I am proud of both teams.  I will be pulling for the Indians in every game now that the Madness has been settled [b]NEDERLAND 39[/b] --- PNG 32 .  GO BULLDOGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nedeland wins on the road Friday!!

[quote name="PNGFan" post="866301" timestamp="1286285003"]
[quote author=BaseBow link=topic=73891.msg866233#msg866233 date=1286267988]
[quote author=pngrick link=topic=73891.msg866232#msg866232 date=1286267554]
[quote author=BaseBow link=topic=73891.msg865437#msg865437 date=1286189508]
I think it says alot that the run D against P.N.G held Bertrand under 100 yds..That is pretty big , I believe it is the first time this season he has been held under a 150yds...That being said a healthy Bulldog team wins ...
[/quote]
Chase Bertrand had 195 yards against Nederland
[/quote]One paper said 200 one paper said 95 ..He did not rush for over 100 ..Watched game again last night and they said in the start of the 4th qtr he had 79 yds ....After the game they said 19 carries 95 yds
[/quote]

I don't think he had 196 yards, but thats what the Chronicle is saying.

http://www.chron.com/sports/highschoolsports/results.html?site=default&mkt=&Season=2010&tpl=Boxscore&Sport=1&ID=75132&TeamID=151&SearchType=Teams
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously YOU do! You commented on my post.   LOL!!!!    ;D    ::)


[quote name="BaseBow" post="864868" timestamp="1286115706"]
[quote author=smitty link=topic=73891.msg864860#msg864860 date=1286115171]
[glow=red,2,300]Hummmm, wonder what I can say about this one[/glow].  I'll have to think on it for a few.    :-\
[/quote/] I would be willing to bet no body cares  :o
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  ;D


[quote name="GrayDog" post="865723" timestamp="1286222225"]
I can't believe we gotta go to Livingston again this year and listen to Reba announce football for 4 quarters - 2 years in a row...  what's up with that?  I think I would rather argue with smitty about the DC...
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DOG fans, if you remember, the very same comments were being posted last year about our expected performance and outcome of the game.  We went to Livingston and showed them we were there to take care of business just like we will do this Friday night.  If anyone thinks that our team is not gonna be fired up for this Friday has a surprise coming.  We are gonna give them a heck of a fight!!!  We beat 'em on their home turf last year  and we will do it again this Friday.

GO BULLDOGS !!!!!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I hope you are right!


[quote name="DOGS1988" post="867102" timestamp="1286382983"]
DOG fans, if you remember, the very same comments were being posted last year about our expected performance and outcome of the game.  We went to Livingston and showed them we were there to take care of business just like we will do this Friday night.  If anyone thinks that our team is not gonna be fired up for this Friday has a surprise coming.  We are gonna give them a heck of a fight!!!  We beat 'em on their home turf last year  and we will do it again this Friday.

GO BULLDOGS !!!!!!!
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes! they seen a different team in vidor 2 weeks ago
but livingston is much faster and stronger,but
it wont be the first time to see a offense much to the like
as theirs. if we do not bring the A game it good be a long
night. hopefully we will come out with a w. we need it! :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...