Kville_Kats Posted October 18, 2010 Report Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name="bleed orange" post="879628" timestamp="1287421752"][quote author=Kville_Kats link=topic=74362.msg879614#msg879614 date=1287421223][quote author=bleed orange link=topic=74362.msg879601#msg879601 date=1287420541]I don't know why everyone gets so uptight over these ranking. Who cares, they don't mean anything. Its not like Setxsports is the Associated Press or something. These guys are just people in the community like me and you trying to provide a service. Some of you people take these ranking way to serious. [/quote] I don't think you understood what I was trying to say...That's exactly my point...It's taken that way by most people...I don't give a crap any way....I know rankings don't win football games....POINTS DO..[/quote]Should have quoted one of the other post, was not talking about yours. 8) 8)[/quote] :-[ :-[ sorry...These rankings are just what you said they were I agree with you there...Sorry once again.. ;)
Guest bleed orange Posted October 18, 2010 Report Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name="Kville_Kats" post="879636" timestamp="1287421956"][quote author=bleed orange link=topic=74362.msg879628#msg879628 date=1287421752][quote author=Kville_Kats link=topic=74362.msg879614#msg879614 date=1287421223][quote author=bleed orange link=topic=74362.msg879601#msg879601 date=1287420541]I don't know why everyone gets so uptight over these ranking. Who cares, they don't mean anything. Its not like Setxsports is the Associated Press or something. These guys are just people in the community like me and you trying to provide a service. Some of you people take these ranking way to serious. [/quote] I don't think you understood what I was trying to say...That's exactly my point...It's taken that way by most people...I don't give a crap any way....I know rankings don't win football games....POINTS DO..[/quote]Should have quoted one of the other post, was not talking about yours. 8) 8)[/quote] :-[ :-[ sorry...These rankings are just what you said they were I agree with you there...Sorry once again.. ;)[/quote]No problem, I posted right after yours so I can see why you thought I was directing my comment at your post.
WOSgrad Posted October 18, 2010 Author Report Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name="Kville_Kats" post="879566" timestamp="1287418866"][quote author=WOSgrad link=topic=74362.msg879464#msg879464 date=1287414652][quote author=the_dude_abides link=topic=74362.msg879456#msg879456 date=1287414014]In theory, would teams 1 - 14 be expected to beat team #15? Is this how the thought process works when determining the rankings? Or are the rankings based on a teams percieved position within their own division? Just curious how a 5A through 3A ranking system is reasoned out.[/quote]How they rank the teams is up to the individual poster. For me, it is the latter. I'll only look at head to head IF it has occurred and even that is not a determining factor.[/quote] Be a lot better if you just removed the rankings..Everyone including myself thinks their team should be ranked higher..Save a lot of confusion..IMO there is no way you can rank teams when they are all bunched together,and play in different classes...kinda dumb really.....lol JMO.. ;)[/quote]It's not like it is required reading. You don't like them? Don't read them!
Kville_Kats Posted October 18, 2010 Report Posted October 18, 2010 [quote name="WOSgrad" post="879699" timestamp="1287425703"][quote author=Kville_Kats link=topic=74362.msg879566#msg879566 date=1287418866][quote author=WOSgrad link=topic=74362.msg879464#msg879464 date=1287414652][quote author=the_dude_abides link=topic=74362.msg879456#msg879456 date=1287414014]In theory, would teams 1 - 14 be expected to beat team #15? Is this how the thought process works when determining the rankings? Or are the rankings based on a teams percieved position within their own division? Just curious how a 5A through 3A ranking system is reasoned out.[/quote]How they rank the teams is up to the individual poster. For me, it is the latter. I'll only look at head to head IF it has occurred and even that is not a determining factor.[/quote] Be a lot better if you just removed the rankings..Everyone including myself thinks their team should be ranked higher..Save a lot of confusion..IMO there is no way you can rank teams when they are all bunched together,and play in different classes...kinda dumb really.....lol JMO.. ;)[/quote]It's not like it is required reading. You don't like them? Don't read them![/quote] Thanks Ill do that... ;)
ECC95 Posted October 20, 2010 Report Posted October 20, 2010 East Chambers should claim the #1 spot after their win over Anahuac.
dray2002 Posted October 20, 2010 Report Posted October 20, 2010 [quote name="ECC95" post="881242" timestamp="1287541667"]East Chambers should claim the #1 spot after their win over Anahuac.[/quote]Seriously
u_dnt_kno_me Posted October 21, 2010 Report Posted October 21, 2010 doing a great job WOS i enjoy reading these
True Blue Posted October 21, 2010 Report Posted October 21, 2010 [quote name="ECC95" post="881242" timestamp="1287541667"]East Chambers should claim the #1 spot after their win over Anahuac.[/quote]How could a team with 2 losses jump over a team that has 0 losses and 3 shutouts???????
Recommended Posts