*** Port Arthur FANS...DON'T TALK SO MUCH NEXT TIME ***
-
Member Statistics
46,206
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
-
So you say Nah , not throwing accusations and turn around and make the accusation again. So this is the ANGLE Goose Creek Athletics will take now. Accuse districts of recruiting their athletes and blame that of why they are not very good -
By Matt Dillon · Posted
1. North Crowley 2. North Shore 3. Atascocita 4. Desoto 5. Summer Creek 6. Kingwood 7. Cibilo Steele 8. College Station 9. A&M Consolidated 10. Lovejoy 11. Texas High 12. Alamo Heights 13. Alvarado 14. Celina 15. Carthage 16. Waco LaVega 17. Winnsboro 18. Malakoff 19. Canadian 20. DeKalb 21. Daingerfield 22. Waskom 23. Shelbyville 24. Refugio 25. Jayton -
Nah, I’m sure they’re clean as a Preacher’s sheets and there’s not a one of those 100 GCCISD kids BHISD gets in every year that’s an athlete. I mean, we’ll know for sure past August because UIL is placing one of their own to look over things in any DEC with a lot of transfers and if there’s one thing BHISD has it’s a lot of transfers. -
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts