eagleswoodville#1 Posted December 25, 2010 Author Report Posted December 25, 2010 Look at it logically. You dont average 21.6 ppg riding the bench "a ton of time". McDaniels is Kountze's playmaker. You take him out, they arent as good. Yes, theyre still a good ball club. But they arent near as good without him. Yes, Silsbee has ten or eleven kids that can play. DC is the guy that holds them together though. Without him, silsbee doesnt do near as good. Theyre still exceptional without him, but not as good.
east texas bb Posted December 25, 2010 Report Posted December 25, 2010 The region will be exciting this year. I think Woodville can play with EC or Kountze. One thing I keep hearing is teams that have players that are still not with the team, when are they going to get with their teams. The season is nearly if not more than halfway finished. The players, not only HJ, but others schools have listed that their BEST players are not playing. When are they? ANd will they be able to mesh with the TEAM that has formed in the 15 games or more so far this season? Most players can just step in and not cause a little friction and at district it is not the greatest time to have you players back. Sounds funny. Because you obviously want your best ones on the court. But more than that you want your beat TEAM on the floor.
whsalum Posted December 25, 2010 Report Posted December 25, 2010 [quote name="eagleswoodville#1" post="938154" timestamp="1293247217"]Look at it logically. You dont average 21.6 ppg riding the bench "a ton of time". McDaniels is Kountze's playmaker. You take him out, they arent as good. Yes, theyre still a good ball club. But they arent near as good without him. Yes, Silsbee has ten or eleven kids that can play. DC is the guy that holds them together though. Without him, silsbee doesnt do near as good. Theyre still exceptional without him, but not as good.[/quote]I have seen Kountze play ALOT this year and have seen McDaniel ride the bench a ton.You make my point for me,Kountze can beat good teams without him because they have players that can take up the slack.The same goes for Silsbee and DC.No doubt both clubs are better with them but are deep.In my opinion,and that's all it is, Woodville doesn't have the depth to win without Sells against good teams.I think Woodville can play with Anahuac this year but I would give Kountze and EC a pretty good edge.
east texas bb Posted December 25, 2010 Report Posted December 25, 2010 I agree with you, but if he makes your point then you make his point. Both teams need their best player to play at their best. But, I think all the teams included would not have the records they have against a pretty good schedule if any of the teams were depending on one player.
bigdog90 Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 this will be ugly 100 to 20 woodville brookeland really is bad
BADSANTA Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 Why is Silsbee in this tourney? Shouldn't they be at the Gamble Classic?
AggiesAreWe Posted December 26, 2010 Report Posted December 26, 2010 [quote name="BADSANTA" post="938353" timestamp="1293377712"]Why is Silsbee in this tourney? Shouldn't they be at the Gamble Classic?[/quote]Maybe the Gamble Classic did not invite them. Ever thought of that? ::)
eagleswoodville#1 Posted December 28, 2010 Author Report Posted December 28, 2010 Woodville won by about 45 or 50. Woodville played great defense. Slacked off ALOT after scoring 50 in the first half. Ended with 68, i think. 68-14 maybe?
Recommended Posts