True Blue Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 But I think the 1st team will have to play NW in the 2 round
KHSAlum400 Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 [quote name="True Blue" post="957303" timestamp="1296328755"]But I think the 1st team will have to play NW in the 2 round[/quote]NW is not as dominant is in year's past...If I had to pick, I would rather face NW before we face Crockett.
AggiesAreWe Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 [quote name="KHSAlum400" post="957289" timestamp="1296325845"]Just noticed the FT disparity from the game. EC: 18-35Kountze: 2-3 :D :-\[/quote]Now that's what I call a disparity, any way you slice it! ;)
True Blue Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 After see both NW and Crocket play early this year, both teams are going to be hard for eather Kountze or EC to match up with, both clubs have size inside. But Kountze did beat Crocket and EC lost too NW twice.
mfd814 Posted January 29, 2011 Report Posted January 29, 2011 Kountze did not get back on defense, no urgency, not enough rebounds. That being said, early foul trouble, that stayed the whole game. EC is a good team and you have to be ready for them. There is no way Kountze/Joubert was looking ahead at the playoffs, and thinking a loss is better for seeding. IF you think that, you do not know Joubert. It was a good game by both teams. The fould count was very uneven, but I think it was not the deciding factor.
True Blue Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 [quote name="mfd814" post="957382" timestamp="1296340163"]Kountze did not get back on defense, no urgency, not enough rebounds. That being said, early foul trouble, that stayed the whole game. EC is a good team and you have to be ready for them. There is no way Kountze/Joubert was looking ahead at the playoffs, and thinking a loss is better for seeding. IF you think that, you do not know Joubert. It was a good game by both teams. The fould count was very uneven, but[b] I think it was not the deciding factor.[/b] [/quote] I would say that a 35 free throws for one team and 3 for the other would be a deciding factor in a 4 point game
FanintheStands Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 [quote name="True Blue" post="957437" timestamp="1296350511"]I would say that a 35 free throws for one team and 3 for the other would be a deciding factor in a 4 point game[/quote]I would say that fouling enough to put the other team at the FT line for 35 tries is the deciding factor of the game.Sometimes referees call fouls because the kids are fouling. ;)
whsalum Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 Sometimes the foul count can be pretty uneven down there but the clubs have to adjust.
True Blue Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 Im not saying that the calls were wrong ,just that if one team shots that many FT it is going to affect the out come of a game.
mfd814 Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 It is difficult to adjust to the uneven foul count, but it must be done. For the most part, Kountze did that to have the lead at one point, and still only lose by 4. Easy put backs, fast breaks and not getting back on defense was more of a deciding factors then fouls called or not called.
Recommended Posts