Jump to content

Is WO-S football going to the I-formation the right move?


Recommended Posts

This guy mentioned that WOS didn't have the size in the Oline to run the I like Katy does, but least he forget WOS ain't playin Katy in week 3 of the playoffs! They are playing like 3A programs who also don't have a huge D-Line.

Cornell is going to hang his and the WOS hats once again on the Chain Gang. Ball control offense with a rested defense that will make plays! Hard to argue that it won't bring WOS a State Title at some point since the spread hasn't gotten them very far either!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to try and second guess coach T.We have gone to the I on and off in the past and did pretty well with it.I'm sure the coaches will tweek it to take advantage of our speed.I don't see them abanding the spread altogather.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="I dont play well with Jaguars" post="1019027" timestamp="1308329506"]
[quote author=BMTJags link=topic=84986.msg1019014#msg1019014 date=1308323754]
Jags, take notes. 
[/quote]they will take notes, after that first butt-whoopin yall will receive from Memorial.  ;) gonna be alotta notes being taken by the Jags.
[/quote] ::) ::)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.  WO-S can beat any team around here with the spread but they've been losing to schools that run right at them.  This isn't anything new.  When they would play Ozen, the times they would lose is when Ozen ran right at them.  Better to take a 8 yard gain going straight, than to take a 3 yard loss going wide.  Besides, practicing against the I makes you tougher defensively.  So when they meet a Coldspring or a Kirbyville, they are more solid up the middle of the defense
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="WOSgrad" post="1018978" timestamp="1308313253"]
http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/sports/hs/article/Take-2-Is-WO-S-football-going-to-the-1427665.php#ixzz1PXFI1FB2

[/quote]

We'll find out this season if it's the right move or not. ........I have a lot of respect for coach T, he was around back when I went to WO and I'm not gonna tell ya how many years ago that was...lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="SFA85" post="1019060" timestamp="1308334688"]
Yep.  WO-S can beat any team around here with the spread but they've been losing to schools that run right at them.  This isn't anything new.  When they would play Ozen, the times they would lose is when Ozen ran right at them.  Better to take a 8 yard gain going straight, than to take a 3 yard loss going wide.  Besides, practicing against the I makes you tougher defensively.  So when they meet a Coldspring or a Kirbyville, they are more solid up the middle of the defense
[/quote]I sure hope a certain coach down in P.A. is reading this post.  ;) Titans need to get in some of that I-Formation with that HOSS Holmes running the peel.



Imma talk to one of the WO-S players this evening and see how he feels about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy Jared Ainsworth...how does he know that WO-S will run an I-formation set?  Has he spoken directly to Cornel about this?  Just because someone is a "reporter" doesn't make it fact. 

I saw a TV interview with Cornel where he said (paraphrasing) that we will "run the ball a [i][u]little more[/u][/i]"...and...that WO-S "has spread athletes now, so we'll still run it".  If you put the two together, and knowing Cornel's traditional thinking and tendencies, I conclude WO-S will simply implement a higher percentage of running plays within a spread (or something similar) type of offense.  Maybe ocassionally they'll line up in the I.  This combination will still take advantage of our speed while also use more time on the clock and keep his defense fresh. 

I just don't see the Mustangs switching wholesale to an I-formation. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="I dont play well with Jaguars" post="1019275" timestamp="1308409306"]
Shared a couple of messages with a player from WO-S. Let's just say the confidence is very VERY high. [b]I wouldnt be surprised if WO-S is #1 by end of the season.  ;)[/b][/quote]

I second that statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that any great coach recognizes what offensive plays and/or schemes work best with the athletes that he has. Coach Thompson has been in this business for a long time, and if he does change the offense, it's because he thinks it will suit the players he has the best.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a change is in order.  While they have had some success in district, they haven't been the offensive juggernaut they could have been with the offensive skill players that have come through the program the last several years.  I trust Coach T to make the right decision.  I am sure WOS will be in the spread some....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="NDN79" post="1019332" timestamp="1308433927"]
I think that any great coach recognizes what offensive plays and/or schemes work best with the athletes that he has. Coach Thompson has been in this business for a long time, and if he does change the offense, it's because he thinks it will suit the players he has the best.
[/quote]

Completely agree.  Sometimes coaches will impose a system on a team regardless of whether they have the personnel to run it successfully or not  (WO-S made that mistake in 2001).  I trust Coach Thompson NOT to do that.  Our returning QB (Salter) is better suited for a rushing style offense as opposed to the spread.  Plus, I can see the Mustangs running the spread part-time and make it all work.  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I have seen over the last few years is a Mustang offense that could move the ball up and down the field, but would, at times, have trouble punching it in.  I think Coach Thompson recognized that as well and went to an offense that gives him a tight end and a full back to help punch a few more holes down in the red zone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="WOSgrad" post="1019451" timestamp="1308494093"]
What I have seen over the last few years is a Mustang offense that could move the ball up and down the field, but would, at times, have trouble punching it in.  I think Coach Thompson recognized that as well and went to an offense that gives him a tight end and a full back to help punch a few more holes down in the red zone
[/quote]
BINGO.  I suspect you will still see some spread, but beefing up the middle and punching it down your throat regularly and using a little clock will be a winning combo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="griff" post="1019442" timestamp="1308489607"]
[quote author=NDN79 link=topic=84986.msg1019332#msg1019332 date=1308433927]
I think that any great coach recognizes what offensive plays and/or schemes work best with the athletes that he has. Coach Thompson has been in this business for a long time, and if he does change the offense, it's because he thinks it will suit the players he has the best.
[/quote]

Completely agree.  Sometimes coaches will impose a system on a team regardless of whether they have the personnel to run it successfully or not  (WO-S made that mistake in 2001).  I trust Coach Thompson NOT to do that.  Our returning QB (Salter) is better suited for a rushing style offense as opposed to the spread.  Plus, I can see the Mustangs running the spread part-time and make it all work.  
[/quote]

Griff, from what I hear, there will be a bunch, maybe 100%, "I". I think our line is going to be much bigger this year and will be boasting the state power lifting champ. This might be the reason for the change. I don't think anyone knows better than Cornel what kind of athletes we have so I have faith that whatever offense we're in it's the best one for the team.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Gasilla" post="1020631" timestamp="1308953815"]
[quote author=griff link=topic=84986.msg1019442#msg1019442 date=1308489607]
[quote author=NDN79 link=topic=84986.msg1019332#msg1019332 date=1308433927]
I think that any great coach recognizes what offensive plays and/or schemes work best with the athletes that he has. Coach Thompson has been in this business for a long time, and if he does change the offense, it's because he thinks it will suit the players he has the best.
[/quote]

Completely agree.  Sometimes coaches will impose a system on a team regardless of whether they have the personnel to run it successfully or not  (WO-S made that mistake in 2001).  I trust Coach Thompson NOT to do that.  Our returning QB (Salter) is better suited for a rushing style offense as opposed to the spread.  Plus, I can see the Mustangs running the spread part-time and make it all work. 
[/quote]

Griff, from what I hear, there will be a bunch, maybe 100%, "I". I think our line is going to be much bigger this year and will be boasting the state power lifting champ. This might be the reason for the change. I don't think anyone knows better than Cornel what kind of athletes we have so I have faith that whatever offense we're in it's the best one for the team.
[/quote]

The 2000 offense wasn't flashy but we hung our hat on defense and field position.  I think (not worth much) that since we got our rear handed to us by Ennis in the championship game, our focus had been on a high powered offense rather than the basics.  I think if WOS gets back to defense first, and a ground focused offesne with the ability to throw the ball....it is a recipe for success.  The game is shortened, the D isn't on the field as much; which leads to field position and points on the board.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I don’t know about any rivalry there because I don’t live there but although LP and DP play in different classifications they still have a lot in common.  I mean, both beat Barber’s Hill this year!
    • I’m super excited for this game.  PNG has the team and game plan that will slow TH down.  No way we can stop them the entire game, but I feel if we slow them down we can win similar to what we did last year to Lake Creek and SOC.  
    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...