Jump to content

DISTRICT 32 LITTLE LEAGUE TOURNAMENT (12 year old) - CHAMPION, BRIDGE CITY

AshlyHasBeen
 Share

Recommended Posts

AshlyHasBeen

AshlyHasBeen

Posted
Posted
June 22
Groves National 11  Nederland 1  F
Bridge City 14  Port Neches 4  F
FHWS 10  Vidor 0  F
June 24
Groves National 17  Port Arthur American 0 F
Bridge City 11 FHWS 1 F
June 25
Port Neches 27  Vidor 1  F, Vidor eliminated  
June 27
Nederland 17  FHWS 4  F, FHWS eliminated
Port Neches 19  Port Arthur American 2  F, Port Arthur American eliminated
July 1
Groves National 3  Bridge City 0  F
Port Neches 5  Nederland 2  F, Port Neches disqualified
July 7
Bridge City 12  Nederland 0  F, Nederland eliminated
July 8
Bridge City 2  Groves National 1
July 9
Bridge City 5  Groves National 2  F, Groves National eliminated

CHAMPION - [color=red]BRIDGE CITY[/color]
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

TradinUp BH

TradinUp BH

Posted
Posted
[quote name="19bulldog88" post="1022508" timestamp="1309951583"]
[quote author=ShlyKBMT link=topic=85190.msg1022070#msg1022070 date=1309636592]
Bridge City will host Port Neches Tuesday night at 7.
[/quote]

Heard PN was disqualified from the district tournament.

Anyone confirm or deny?
[/quote]
not true. Deal is they have a kid that is 12 years old that played up in junior senior league with 13 and 14's. He is only 12 though. BC is contesting that he is an illegal player since he didn't play in the 11/12 year old division. They are waiting on a response from Williamsport. BC contested it, and they suspended last nights game until an official ruling from Williamsport.

Senior league is still part of little league. The kid is really good and played up. I think he should be able to play IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldNedDog

OldNedDog

Posted
Posted
[quote name="Scalp'em" post="1022514" timestamp="1309956977"]
[quote author=19bulldog88 link=topic=85190.msg1022508#msg1022508 date=1309951583]
[quote author=ShlyKBMT link=topic=85190.msg1022070#msg1022070 date=1309636592]
Bridge City will host Port Neches Tuesday night at 7.
[/quote]

Heard PN was disqualified from the district tournament.

Anyone confirm or deny?
[/quote]
not true. Deal is they have a kid that is 12 years old that played up in junior senior league with 13 and 14's. He is only 12 though. BC is contesting that he is an illegal player since he didn't play in the 11/12 year old division. Theyare waiting on a response from Williamsport.

Senior league is still part of little league. The kid is really good and played up. I think he should able to play IMO.
[/quote]

Thanks for the info. Was wondering if there was a "Danny Almonte" situation brewing!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
spoonbill

spoonbill

Posted
Posted
[quote name="Scalp'em" post="1022514" timestamp="1309956977"]
[quote author=19bulldog88 link=topic=85190.msg1022508#msg1022508 date=1309951583]
[quote author=ShlyKBMT link=topic=85190.msg1022070#msg1022070 date=1309636592]
Bridge City will host Port Neches Tuesday night at 7.
[/quote]

Heard PN was disqualified from the district tournament.

Anyone confirm or deny?
[/quote]
not true. Deal is they have a kid that is 12 years old that played up in junior senior league with 13 and 14's. He is only 12 though. BC is contesting that he is an illegal player since he didn't play in the 11/12 year old division. They are waiting on a response from Williamsport. BC contested it, and they suspended last nights game until an official ruling from Williamsport.

Senior league is still part of little league. The kid is really good and played up. I think he should be able to play IMO.
[/quote]most of the guys that run district 32 were originally from bcll. the district administrator's name is on the major league field in bc. with that being said, he is an excellent d.a., and would never do anything that wasn't by the book. that's probably why he sent the matter to williamsport. i believe there is a rule in the green book about playing a certain amount of games within the division you are selected an all-star in during the regular season. hopefully the kid gets to play. it looks pretty petty on the bridge city person that contested it. this should have been taken care of during the affidavit meeting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TradinUp BH

TradinUp BH

Posted
Posted
I'm just wondering how it's different from a kid that let's say is 10 years old and in the league 9's and 10's play together. The kid decides to play in the 11/12 year old division, but when all-stars comes around, he is picked on the 10 year old all-star team. Senior league is considered a division of little league just like minor to major in the lower divisions. It will be interesting to see the results from Williamsport.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
spoonbill

spoonbill

Posted
Posted
[quote name="Scalp'em" post="1022536" timestamp="1309963339"]
I'm just wondering how it's different from a kid that let's say is 10 years old and in the league 9's and 10's play together. The kid decides to play in the 11/12 year old division, but when all-stars comes around, he is picked on the 10 year old all-star team. Senior league is considered a division of little league just like minor to major in the lower divisions. It will be interesting to see the results from Williamsport.
[/quote]i think you are talking about the junior division (13-14) not seniors (15-16). the break between 12 and 13 isn't the same as 9-12. a 13 yr old CAN'T play down with the 12's in other words. i don't have a current green book to look this up, but i hope it works out for the kid. there are definitely some odd rules in the book. it's very wordy, but they are trying their best to be as fair as possible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TradinUp BH

TradinUp BH

Posted
Posted
[quote name="spoonbill" post="1022550" timestamp="1309967187"]
[quote author=Scalp'em link=topic=85190.msg1022536#msg1022536 date=1309963339]
I'm just wondering how it's different from a kid that let's say is 10 years old and in the league 9's and 10's play together. The kid decides to play in the 11/12 year old division, but when all-stars comes around, he is picked on the 10 year old all-star team. Senior league is considered a division of little league just like minor to major in the lower divisions. It will be interesting to see the results from Williamsport.
[/quote]i think you are talking about the junior division (13-14) not seniors (15-16). the break between 12 and 13 isn't the same as 9-12. a 13 yr old CAN'T play down with the 12's in other words. i don't have a current green book to look this up, but i hope it works out for the kid. there are definitely some odd rules in the book. it's very wordy, but they are trying their best to be as fair as possible.
[/quote]
I understand that, but the kid is a legit 12 year old. He's not playing down. He played up during the regular season. I don't know the rule on it. It's an interesting issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TradinUp BH

TradinUp BH

Posted
Posted
[quote name="JWB" post="1022560" timestamp="1309971214"]
If he played up,why didn't he make the Jr. division Allstar Team? ???
[/quote]
I know our local rule at Port Neches is that you can only play all-stars with your age division. So none of our teams 9-12 years old can pull up a kid. If your a stud 11 year old, you have to play 11 year old all-stars. I disagree with the concept, but that's the Port Neches rule.

Also, the DA your talking about told our President at the beginning of the year that it was ok for him to play up and there would be no issues in all-stars. Now, take this for what it's worth, but now PN and BC play each other for the right to play Groves and the issue is brought up? Also by suspending the game, BC's top pitcher will be eligible to pitch as the game has been delayed a day or two. I'm getting that from our side. Don't know about the other side of it. ::)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
spoonbill

spoonbill

Posted
Posted
[quote name="19bulldog88" post="1022577" timestamp="1309974252"]
Just got word that Ned will be playing BC tomorrow night in BC.

PN must have been ruled disqualified.
[/quote]no way?? really...that sucks. this should have been caught at the affidavit meeting. that is why you have it...to make sure everything is on the up and up. unless port neches falsified something on the affidavit, this stinks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • weonlyrun28toss
      Pineywoods Hoopfest, Lufkin Nov. 25-26/Post updates and results here

      By weonlyrun28toss · Posted

      naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Cu Chulainn
      Orangefield 65 Livingston 83/FINAL

      By Cu Chulainn · Posted

      Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • TxHoops
      Susan Smith

      By TxHoops · Posted

      I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • setxathlete14
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

      AMEN!

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...