Jump to content

SETX Coaching Salaries


McLovin

Recommended Posts

Has there been recent conversation on coaching salaries in Southeast Texas? Who are the highest paid? Who offers more to assistants? I assume this info is in a public record somewhere, so why not compile it? Also, any juicy rumors of coaches getting more than we're told? I believe this thread has real potential if it doesn't already exist.

If nothing else post what you've heard about the pay scale at local schools.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coach Barbay really cleans up,his salary is mostly based on performance by his team, he gets 100 dollars per yard gained,50 dollars per TD,25 dollars per tackle, 10 dollars per interception, half the take from the concession stand and the gate, stock options and mutual funds, all which he gladly donates to the " I got that ass spanked by Coldspring relief fund" but he does have a lifetime job and the fan appreciation from most of San Jacinto County.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heard from someone that should know that Bob Jones at Shepherd was making 85K...Sounded really high to me but they seemed sure about the figure...

Also heard Barbay at Coldspring is in the 60's but I don't know it to be the case for sure, however, it wouldn't surprise me since pretty much everyone at COCISD seems to be underpaid all the way up to the superintendent, who a few months ago declined a scheduled raise from the school board, and makes about 20K less a year than fellow 3A superintendents with similar school numbers student body wise...

Not every coach is worried about how much they make but on the same hand I'm sure they like to feel appreciated and rewarded for a job well done and usually the best way to show them is to stay out of their way (when warranted) and compensate them well...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="GoDogs27" post="1067317" timestamp="1317097934"]
I think Neumann is around 90k but he was making a lot less before being considered at La Marque a few years ago. I don't know Faircloth's but I'm sure its higher. I think I remember Daytons coach over 100k.
[/quote]
Faircloth started at $82K on his original 2 year deal. He does not make near what Neuman makes yet. At the time of the LaMarque proposal he (Neuman) was at 90K and the LM job offer was at 103K from what I recall, so I would bet he is close to 100K if not right at it. Allman at Westlake got $125K to leave Permian (his alma mater)!

I know all three BISD coaches make the same, in the 75K - 80K range. This could be a problem if Stump gets an offer he cant refuse, since a 20K raise would cost 60K to the BISD the way they scale. Not sure anyone would be real happy giving Washington and Nelson an extra 20K to keep Stump?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="badndn" post="1067368" timestamp="1317129384"]
[quote author=GoDogs27 link=topic=88876.msg1067317#msg1067317 date=1317097934]
I think Neumann is around 90k but he was making a lot less before being considered at La Marque a few years ago. I don't know Faircloth's but I'm sure its higher. I think I remember Daytons coach over 100k.
[/quote]
Faircloth started at $82K on his original 2 year deal. He does not make near what Neuman makes yet. At the time of the LaMarque proposal he (Neuman) was at 90K and the LM job offer was at 103K from what I recall, so I would bet he is close to 100K if not right at it. Allman at Westlake got $125K to leave Permian (his alma mater)!

I know all three BISD coaches make the same, in the 75K - 80K range. This could be a problem if Stump gets an offer he cant refuse, since a 20K raise would cost 60K to the BISD the way they scale. Not sure anyone would be real happy giving Washington and Nelson an extra 20K to keep Stump?
[/quote]

I don't have the exact figure in front of me but Neumann was at about 75k before the La Marque offer.. I don't think he ever really wanted to leave but used that offer as leverage. Don't blame him..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...