eagleswoodville#1 Posted October 2, 2011 Report Posted October 2, 2011 Woodville(2-3) coming off a convincing win over the Warren Warriors, 54-0. Newton(3-2) coming off a loss to the Winnie East Chambers Buccaneers, 39-34. Newton has alot of fire power this year and a pretty stout defense. Woodvilles offense is starting to come around and with a defense that allowed only 14 true offensive points to a stout EC team. The difference in this game will be whether Newton comes to play or not. If they do:Woodville 21Newton 31If they dont:Woodville 35Newton 28
GATA Posted October 2, 2011 Report Posted October 2, 2011 we were not on track last week at all, hopefully we will come to play this week, if not we will take another L,
ECfan4life! Posted October 2, 2011 Report Posted October 2, 2011 I believe that newton will show up and play this week. so im gonna go with Newton but if they dont show up.. this could get bad for them.
justsaying Posted October 2, 2011 Report Posted October 2, 2011 I think Newton has to many offensive weapons for Woodville... going to say:Newton 34Woodville 14
ChampionEagles Posted October 2, 2011 Report Posted October 2, 2011 Woodville will have to face a Newton team that did not get the job done in EC and will be trying to make up for that. The other thing is it will be in Newton. Uphill battle for Woodville. Newton by 2 touchdowns.
ChampionEagles Posted October 3, 2011 Report Posted October 3, 2011 Kevin may play. I think it is how things look for him in practice this week. Might be next week.
uknowit2 Posted October 3, 2011 Report Posted October 3, 2011 I guess we should call this game the "We haven't played anybody any good yet" Bowl for the 2nd year in a row...
WOSgrad Posted October 3, 2011 Report Posted October 3, 2011 I wouldn't pencil in Newton so fast if they can't handle ellusive backs because Woodville also has on in the form of Trent Daniels, he went for 283 yards and 3 TD's last week.
ChampionEagles Posted October 4, 2011 Report Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name="WOSgrad" post="1072839" timestamp="1317676991"]I wouldn't pencil in Newton so fast if they can't handle ellusive backs because Woodville also has on in the form of Trent Daniels, he went for 283 yards and 3 TD's last week.[/quote]Your right. Newton tackled like little girls against EC. But I think a week of WT's ire will change that. ;D
uknowit2 Posted October 4, 2011 Report Posted October 4, 2011 Or maybe the Newton players did the best they could but EC was just the better team for the 2nd year in a row...Naah...that couldn't be it...
88Warrior Posted October 4, 2011 Report Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name="WOSgrad" post="1072839" timestamp="1317676991"]I wouldn't pencil in Newton so fast if they can't handle ellusive backs because Woodville also has on in the form of Trent Daniels, he went for 283 yards and 3 TD's last week.[/quote] I think it's safe to say the Newton defense will be vastly more challenging to Woodville than my Warriors were last week...
Claude Posted October 4, 2011 Report Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name="uknowit2" post="1073173" timestamp="1317737162"]Or maybe the Newton players did the best they could but EC was just the better team for the 2nd year in a row...Naah...that couldn't be it...[/quote]Uh if you seen newton play early in the year then you would know that was the worst game Newton has played all year... EC played good and Newton Played terrible. Hopefully if both these teams make it to playoffs they can meet again.
APanthers Posted October 4, 2011 Report Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name="Claude" post="1073576" timestamp="1317765526"][quote author=uknowit2 link=topic=89182.msg1073173#msg1073173 date=1317737162]Or maybe the Newton players did the best they could but EC was just the better team for the 2nd year in a row...Naah...that couldn't be it...[/quote]Uh if you seen newton play early in the year then you would know that was the worst game Newton has played all year... EC played good and Newton Played terrible. Hopefully if both these teams make it to playoffs they can meet again.[/quote]I have thought the same thing the last two years in a row when E.C beat us.
eagleswoodville#1 Posted October 5, 2011 Author Report Posted October 5, 2011 [quote name="WOSgrad" post="1072839" timestamp="1317676991"]I wouldn't pencil in Newton so fast if they can't handle ellusive backs because Woodville also has on in the form of Trent Daniels, he went for 283 yards and 3 TD's last week.[/quote]Not to mention lockhart had 150+ and 2TD's in the first half along with Harrison's 100+ and 1 TD. Woodville ran 4 or 5 backs on a high level consistently all night. They showed people alot more than they expected.
eagleswoodville#1 Posted October 5, 2011 Author Report Posted October 5, 2011 Ok so for the second year in a row...Newton comes in, a highly ranked team that has high expectations, and loses to EC. Ok, not a big deal. But cut the excuses. I understand Newton had a terrible game. Every highschool football team does every now and then. East Chambers handed it to Newton last week. Whether Nwtn had a bad game or not. EC is a really good football team and its gonna take a really good football team that shows up to play to beat them. If Newton wouldve done that, they wouldve had a whole lot better chance of winning. But I think Newton is very well-coached and have some good athletes and if they decide to do it, they can get it together and still be a district contender. Theyre a very good football team.
GATA Posted October 5, 2011 Report Posted October 5, 2011 no excuses here, just standing behind my team,......big 10/4............see ya at the 50
Mustang-Fan Posted October 5, 2011 Report Posted October 5, 2011 [quote name="eagleswoodville#1" post="1073661" timestamp="1317773250"][quote author=WOSgrad link=topic=89182.msg1072839#msg1072839 date=1317676991]I wouldn't pencil in Newton so fast if they can't handle ellusive backs because Woodville also has on in the form of Trent Daniels, he went for 283 yards and 3 TD's last week.[/quote]Not to mention lockhart had 150+ and 2TD's in the first half along with Harrison's 100+ and 1 TD. Woodville ran 4 or 5 backs on a high level consistently all night. They showed people alot more than they expected.[/quote]Not to mention you played Warren!!! ;)
eagleswoodville#1 Posted October 5, 2011 Author Report Posted October 5, 2011 [quote name="Sportz-Fanatic" post="1073713" timestamp="1317778005"][quote author=eagleswoodville#1 link=topic=89182.msg1073661#msg1073661 date=1317773250][quote author=WOSgrad link=topic=89182.msg1072839#msg1072839 date=1317676991]I wouldn't pencil in Newton so fast if they can't handle ellusive backs because Woodville also has on in the form of Trent Daniels, he went for 283 yards and 3 TD's last week.[/quote]Not to mention lockhart had 150+ and 2TD's in the first half along with Harrison's 100+ and 1 TD. Woodville ran 4 or 5 backs on a high level consistently all night. They showed people alot more than they expected.[/quote]Not to mention you played Warren!!! ;)[/quote]OKay well when whoever you support plays Warren, get back to me and let me know how many 100+ yard performances yall have. We're at 2 possibly 3 100+ and 1 250+ and over 500 yds rushing as a team. If your team beats that, ill admit that it means absolutely nothing JUST because it was against Warren. Yes, Warren isnt very good at all. But 500 yards rushing, 54 points, and a shutout is great against anyone. No matter the talent level. But again, get back to me on that.
Recommended Posts