Jump to content

Hamshire-Fannett vs. West Orange-Stark Game Thread/WO-S wins!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="bh89-2" post="1076650" timestamp="1318043331"]
OK, time to finally drop WOS out of the polls.  Good grief.  ::)
[/quote]

Nobody cares about that silly poll.

The problems on offense are serious.  If you toss out the Jasper and Kirbyville games, the only time we've looked pretty good on offense was the first game of the year against Nederland.  In all the other games where we faced good competition, our offense has gotten progressively worse.  This isn't working.  The offense is still making too many of the kind of mistakes that should be ironed out by now - penalties, bad snaps, turnovers, miscommunication on the play calls, etc.  Also, we are not built to be a "run up the gut" offense.  Our tailbacks are not right for that style.  We've got so much speed to burn...why aren't we running sweeps and using the outside where our backs have space to run and create separation?  Throwing the ball a little more would also help us.  Please, Mr. OC, get a better read on our personnel and maximize our strengths. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hamshire has improved...i know their record doesnt indicate it..but they really came to play tonight....receivers #84 and #1 played great games for HF....and wos just looked out of sync the whole night...defense had oppurtunities to make at least 3 picks and dropped them all... offense cannot keep turning the ball over and expect to be successful...the longhorns made the plays that kept it close, got to give them credit...wos better wake up and start finding a way to be more focused in these ballgames.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="griff" post="1076717" timestamp="1318044624"]
[quote author=bh89-2 link=topic=89452.msg1076650#msg1076650 date=1318043331]
OK, time to finally drop WOS out of the polls.  Good grief.  ::)
[/quote]

Nobody cares about that silly poll.

The problems on offense are serious.  If you toss out the Jasper and Kirbyville games, the only time we've looked pretty good on offense was the first game of the year against Nederland.  In all the other games where we faced good competition, our offense has gotten progressively worse.  This isn't working.  The offense is still making too many of the kind of mistakes that should be ironed out by now - penalties, bad snaps, miscommunication on the play calls, etc.  Also, we are not built to be a "run up the gut" offense.  Our tailbacks are not right for that style.  We've got so much speed to burn...why aren't we running sweeps and using the outside where our backs have space to run and create separation?  Throwing the ball a little more would also help us.  Please, Mr. OC, get a better read on our personnel and maximize our strengths.
[/quote]

The defense is great....the offense has more
holes than swiss cheese.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="paintballove" post="1076898" timestamp="1318055222"]

I'm also still wondering why WOS is and has been hanging in the polls.  ???
[/quote]

I do think OF has a really solid shot at beating WOS. If WOS doesn't solve its offensive problems and solve them quick they may have a rough time the rest of the year. They are about to go through a rough part in their schedule with OF, BC, and then Silsbee.  Typically WOS teams dig deep but not sure if they just don't have the personnel this year; coaching, or pride; however, something is different.  WOS was outgained by HF in total yards so actually besides the saving play of the special teams WOS pretty much were lucky to get out with the W.  I think next week will tell all.........they lose to OF, stick a fork in the stangs as they are done for the rest of the season........however, no worries they will still be in the polls.....j/k ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice that they have no pride or confident team. You know Mustang always motivate and fire up all the time but this team is not the same.

I wonder what happen to Collin (#21) did not play. He is key and motivate for defense team. Do you have any idea why he did not play?

I agree that if Orangefield beat them or close score by Orangefield then they will be done or exit early in the playoff. It really up to players that they want play serious or not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="WO-S 89" post="1076856" timestamp="1318050740"]
I sure would like to see #10 Chase Ruthledge get some playing time.
[/quote]


Chase Rutledge isn't ready for varsity, I don't even know why he was moved up. The QB should be Jamarcus Rhodes, he's a much better QB than both of them and Renfro did well at QB the few times they put him there. That's one area the changes need to be made. Also a few on the OL needs to go. There are some on the JV that are better players.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The key is our offensive line. They just aren't playing well and haven't been. Even last week against K-Ville, we had success throwing, but never really established anything on the ground and if 43 isn't in there we do next to nothing.

People talk about schemes etc, but our offensive line has only one kid back from last season (and this year he is playing both ways) and they are still struggling to find their identity. Every game it seems they are playing in different spots trying to find the right fit. No matter what offense you run, if you can't block you aren't going to have success.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mustangproud" post="1077036" timestamp="1318080652"]
[quote author=WO-S 89 link=topic=89452.msg1076856#msg1076856 date=1318050740]
I sure would like to see #10 Chase Ruthledge get some playing time.
[/quote]


Is Rhodes number 3?

Chase Rutledge isn't ready for varsity, I don't even know why he was moved up. The QB should be Jamarcus Rhodes, he's a much better QB than both of them and Renfro did well at QB the few times they put him there. That's one area the changes need to be made. Also a few on the OL needs to go. There are some on the JV that are better players.
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Gasilla" post="1077059" timestamp="1318082312"]
The key is our offensive line. They just aren't playing well and haven't been. Even last week against K-Ville, we had success throwing, but never really established anything on the ground and if 43 isn't in there we do next to nothing.

People talk about schemes etc, but our offensive line has only one kid back from last season (and this year he is playing both ways) and they are still struggling to find their identity. Every game it seems they are playing in different spots trying to find the right fit. No matter what offense you run, if you can't block you aren't going to have success.
[/quote]I believe you nailed it with this. One does not realize how valuable the oline is until thier gone.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

first off my hats off to the HF coaching staff getting there kids ready for this game the kids from HF did a outstanding job played with alot of heart and pride.now then  let me add this that the snap over the punters head was a (SMART) coaching move  it was planned that way guys.early in this game wo-s lost ther key  linebacker out for all the game that to me was a BIG blow to the mustangs  chain gang thay never looked the same after he went out. now lets talk about lindsey he had NO place to run in the middle most of the night then someone up stairs in the press woke up hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm maybe he will do better on the sweep and you saw what happned it WORKED.ok  now in closeing i do agree with you that a chang (MUST) be made in the backfield i dont think it will hurt at all .PS all of you there did you see after interceped the young QB went to the sideline and the OC did not even come over to talk with this young kid  just let him stand there and say anything to him THIS IS SUPER BAD  SORRY FOR THE SPELLING
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The longhorns played a good game tonight and i give them credit! But tonight was a simple case of over looking and opponent! We came out looking to work on things on the first drive, like points were going to be handed to us! If salter could throw the ball to wide open people it would have been 50 to 12 haha but ii still like this wos team and still believe they will be a contender in the play offs. Were not a super flashy team like usual but will get the job done!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last night the Mustangs were not having "FUN".  In my  humble openion the team needs to enjoy playing football.  For starters,  when they run out on the field to start the game they should dispense with the symbolism and get excited about playing some "HARD NOSE FOOTBALL"      I would like to congratulate Hamshire-Fannett on the way they played this game.  They were terrific.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="skipper" post="1077090" timestamp="1318084844"]
first off my hats off to the HF coaching staff getting there kids ready for this game the kids from HF did a outstanding job played with alot of heart and pride.now then  let me add this that the snap over the punters head was a (SMART) coaching move  it was planned that way guys.early in this game wo-s lost ther key  linebacker out for all the game that to me was a BIG blow to the mustangs  chain gang thay never looked the same after he went out. now lets talk about lindsey he had NO place to run in the middle most of the night then someone up stairs in the press woke up hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm maybe he will do better on the sweep and you saw what happned it WORKED.ok  now in closeing i do agree with you that a chang (MUST) be made in the backfield i dont think it will hurt at all .PS all of you there did you see after interceped the young QB went to the sideline and the OC did not even come over to talk with this young kid  just let him stand there and say anything to him THIS IS SUPER BAD  SORRY FOR THE SPELLING
[/quote]Skip your right that the oc didnt come talk to him but did you see the coach with his arm around Jimmy after the play talking with him?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="mustangproud" post="1077036" timestamp="1318080652"]
[quote author=WO-S 89 link=topic=89452.msg1076856#msg1076856 date=1318050740]
I sure would like to see #10 Chase Ruthledge get some playing time.
[/quote]


Chase Rutledge isn't ready for varsity, I don't even know why he was moved up. The QB should be Jamarcus Rhodes, he's a much better QB than both of them and Renfro did well at QB the few times they put him there. That's one area the changes need to be made. Also a few on the OL needs to go. There are some on the JV that are better players.
[/quote]Your right the oline is struggling and no doubt the line will be better next year but one must remember those jv players are blocking jv players.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think its an ego thing for this new oc, its his offense and his way and hes gonna implement his offense regardless of the outcome. his offense has never worked including this year!

i think this coaching staff has lost these kids...too many big changes by coaches who dont know what mustang football is all about!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...