Jump to content

Hamshire-Fannett vs. West Orange-Stark Game Thread/WO-S wins!


Recommended Posts

21-3a WILL  just have to get use to HF NOT BEING AN EASY CHECK OFF WIN THIS SEASON AND SEASONS TO COME.AND we or not happy with it being a moral victory.Because it is still a defeat,and we at HF have to change our way of thinking and find out that we can be the better team on the field,21-3a it is coming and the HF LONGHORNS WILL BE BRINGING IT.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

AMAN to that venom if you were at the game agnest giddings and watched the kids on the sidelines that did not like to hold hands on the kickoffs THERE IS A PROBLEM in the mustang camp belive me these kids need to get it togather agan and start playing togather agan it even showed up in the kirbyville game there is no more 112% with the mustangs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Mustangs is not play 112% anymore. They need step up and play HARD 112%.

O.C. should leave since he mess up on players and confuse them. Sometime, I wish that Toby should not leave and stay because he is loyal to Mustangs. I still don't understand why he left and got new job which is same position.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="dawg13" post="1077174" timestamp="1318091609"]
21-3a WILL  just have to get use to HF NOT BEING AN EASY CHECK OFF WIN THIS SEASON AND SEASONS TO COME.AND we or not happy with it being a moral victory.Because it is still a defeat,and we at HF have to change our way of thinking and find out that we can be the better team on the field,21-3a it is coming and the HF LONGHORNS WILL BE BRINGING IT.
[/quote]

Exactly, but I still dont think hf is using all of their weapons on offense I feel like they have much more
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="venom33" post="1077167" timestamp="1318090744"]
i think its an ego thing for this new oc, its his offense and his way and hes gonna implement his offense regardless of the outcome. his offense has never worked including this year!

i think this coaching staff has lost these kids...too many big changes by coaches who dont know what mustang football is all about!
[/quote]venom, I agree with you. I like the way you put it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going fo panic like some are. We are still WOS. I just was VERY disappointed in the effort last night. I can't put blame on anyone because I have no idea who that team was. It wasn't mustang football. I do however, believe that hf isn't the same pushover they used to be. They came to play and I applaud them for that. I'm just so confused on what is going on. It's crazy that we win a game but feel we lost. That is just the way it is when you put that silver hat on. Nothing tolerated but perfection. Hopefully last night was a wakeup call to whomever or whatever the problem is. Let's play real Mustang ball now. 112%
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="kicker" post="1077301" timestamp="1318099863"]
I'm not going fo panic like some are. We are still WOS. I just was VERY disappointed in the effort last night. I can't put blame on anyone because I have no idea who that team was. It wasn't mustang football. I do however, [b]believe that hf isn't the same pushover they used to be. [/b]They came to play and I applaud them for that. I'm just so confused on what is going on. It's crazy that we win a game but feel we lost. That is just the way it is when you put that silver hat on. Nothing tolerated but perfection. Hopefully last night was a wakeup call to whomever or whatever the problem is. Let's play real Mustang ball now. 112%
[/quote]


I wonder what changed for HF since these 4 games from earlier this season:

at Anahuac         6-21    L
Buna         21-56  L
at Huffman     10-41  L
Beaumont Kelly         27-41  L


I say it was more of WOS playing badly. I think the Mustangs will bounce back with a vengeance next week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1077310" timestamp="1318100384"]
[quote author=kicker link=topic=89452.msg1077301#msg1077301 date=1318099863]
I'm not going fo panic like some are. We are still WOS. I just was VERY disappointed in the effort last night. I can't put blame on anyone because I have no idea who that team was. It wasn't mustang football. I do however, [b]believe that hf isn't the same pushover they used to be. [/b]They came to play and I applaud them for that. I'm just so confused on what is going on. It's crazy that we win a game but feel we lost. That is just the way it is when you put that silver hat on. Nothing tolerated but perfection. Hopefully last night was a wakeup call to whomever or whatever the problem is. Let's play real Mustang ball now. 112%
[/quote]


I wonder what changed for HF since these 4 games from earlier this season:

at Anahuac         6-21    L
Buna         21-56  L
at Huffman     10-41  L
Beaumont Kelly         27-41  L


I say it was more of WOS playing badly. I think the Mustangs will bounce back with a vengeance next week.
[/quote]


you can say what you want but I have been to every Longhorn game and this was the first time that I have actually seen them play all four quarters. The mustangs did struggle, but the horns deserve some credit for the way that they hung in there last night, and all of those games that you listed are games that the longhorns played their game in for one half in, whether it be the first or second.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1077310" timestamp="1318100384"]
[quote author=kicker link=topic=89452.msg1077301#msg1077301 date=1318099863]
I'm not going fo panic like some are. We are still WOS. I just was VERY disappointed in the effort last night. I can't put blame on anyone because I have no idea who that team was. It wasn't mustang football. I do however, [b]believe that hf isn't the same pushover they used to be. [/b]They came to play and I applaud them for that. I'm just so confused on what is going on. It's crazy that we win a game but feel we lost. That is just the way it is when you put that silver hat on. Nothing tolerated but perfection. Hopefully last night was a wakeup call to whomever or whatever the problem is. Let's play real Mustang ball now. 112%
[/quote]

Only if it's a bye-week.  ;)


I wonder what changed for HF since these 4 games from earlier this season:

at Anahuac         6-21    L
Buna         21-56  L
at Huffman     10-41  L
Beaumont Kelly         27-41  L


I say it was more of WOS playing badly. I think the Mustangs will bounce back with a vengeance next week.
[/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Real Talk12" post="1077357" timestamp="1318103816"]
[quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=89452.msg1077310#msg1077310 date=1318100384]
[quote author=kicker link=topic=89452.msg1077301#msg1077301 date=1318099863]
I'm not going fo panic like some are. We are still WOS. I just was VERY disappointed in the effort last night. I can't put blame on anyone because I have no idea who that team was. It wasn't mustang football. I do however, [b]believe that hf isn't the same pushover they used to be. [/b]They came to play and I applaud them for that. I'm just so confused on what is going on. It's crazy that we win a game but feel we lost. That is just the way it is when you put that silver hat on. Nothing tolerated but perfection. Hopefully last night was a wakeup call to whomever or whatever the problem is. Let's play real Mustang ball now. 112%
[/quote]


I wonder what changed for HF since these 4 games from earlier this season:

at Anahuac         6-21    L
Buna         21-56  L
at Huffman     10-41  L
Beaumont Kelly         27-41  L


I say it was more of WOS playing badly. I think the Mustangs will bounce back with a vengeance next week.
[/quote]


you can say what you want but I have been to every Longhorn game and this was the first time that I have actually seen them play all four quarters. The mustangs did struggle, but the horns deserve some credit for the way that they hung in there last night, and all of those games that you listed are games that the longhorns played their game in for one half in, whether it be the first or second.
[/quote]

Ok, so what you are saying is that the previous loses are because yall played only one half in each game? I'm confused with your logic. Football is TWO halves and an L is an L. As ESPN so elegantly says it.......COME ON MAN.......LOL.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats from the Orangeleader:

H-F, Trevor Bell 5-115, Rhett Williamson 5-30, Cameron Malveaux 3-35, Sam Huff 2-15, Layne Miguez 1-10, Kevin Carmon 1-10
Dante Smith QB 17-33-1

With 33 pass attempts and 17 completions, it sounds like the Horns are spreading it out pretty well.  Not too sure about the Horns not using all their weapons.  16 incompletions equals about 52%, the question is how many of those INC were dropped passes?  I'm sure Miquez and Carmon were thrown to more than just once.  How many times did the receiving corp have balls hit their hands and not make receptions.  Maybe REALTALK can help me with this one  ::)



Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="killingmesmalls" post="1077635" timestamp="1318124464"]
Stats from the Orangeleader:

H-F, Trevor Bell 5-115, Rhett Williamson 5-30, Cameron Malveaux 3-35, Sam Huff 2-15, Layne Miguez 1-10, Kevin Carmon 1-10
Dante Smith QB 17-33-1

With 33 pass attempts and 17 completions, it sounds like the Horns are spreading it out pretty well.  Not too sure about the Horns not using all their weapons.  16 incompletions equals about 52%, the question is how many of those INC were dropped passes?  I'm sure Miquez and Carmon were thrown to more than just once.  How many times did the receiving corp have balls hit their hands and not make receptions.  Maybe REALTALK can help me with this one  ::)
[/quote]

I only remember maybe one openly dropped pass to my recollection.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can name two good things came out of this game for WOS.  #1.  If you tackel the other team too hard you will get a 15 yard penilty. So don`t tackel too hard.  #2.  #13 Da`Carlos Renfro was a phenomenal.  I would keep him in the  O-backfield all night  long.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="speveto" post="1077997" timestamp="1318166930"]
I can name two good things came out of this game for WOS.  #1.  If you tackel the other team too hard you will get a 15 yard penilty. So don`t tackel too hard.  #2.  #13 Da`Carlos Renfro was a phenomenal.  I would keep him in the  O-backfield all night  long.
[/quote] ;D ;D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="killingmesmalls" post="1077635" timestamp="1318124464"]
Stats from the Orangeleader:

H-F, Trevor Bell 5-115, Rhett Williamson 5-30, Cameron Malveaux 3-35, Sam Huff 2-15, Layne Miguez 1-10, Kevin Carmon 1-10
Dante Smith QB 17-33-1

With 33 pass attempts and 17 completions, it sounds like the Horns are spreading it out pretty well.  Not too sure about the Horns not using all their weapons.  16 incompletions equals about 52%, the question is how many of those INC were dropped passes?  I'm sure Miquez and Carmon were thrown to more than just once.  How many times did the receiving corp have balls hit their hands and not make receptions.  Maybe REALTALK can help me with this one  ::)
[/quote]neither Miguez or Carmon were targeted much more than that and it's a shame, one was the leading receiver going into the game and both can actually catch the ball IF it gets to them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree somewhat but our HF recievers need to fight for the ball and not give up on the play.you look at the difference when we caught the ball or missed it we where worried about a hit instead of going up field after the catch its easy to second guess because im not on the field.Just my assesment.BUT IM A TRUE FAN.AND I AM VERY HAPPY WITH THE COACHING STAFF AND THE KIDS,IMPROVEMENT AND WHEN THE KIDS TAKE FELD BELIEVING THAT THEY OR THE BEST GOOD RESULTS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...