Jump to content

WO-S at Orangefield Predictions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I said WOS wasn't good to me this year. Kirbyville just gave up after the muffed punts and touchdowns on kick returns. I'm not trying to be negative because we're not good this year either, but WOS shouldn't be a rank team this year. If they play Coldspring i'm willing to bet any mustangs fan that the Trojans would put at least 40+ on the Stangs easily and be ready for the next round.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="1077214" timestamp="1318095135"]
I said WOS wasn't good to me this year. Kirbyville just gave up after the muffed punts and touchdowns on kick returns. I'm not trying to be negative because we're not good this year either, but WOS shouldn't be a rank team this year. If they play Coldspring i'm willing to bet any mustangs fan that the Trojans would put at least 40+ on the Stangs easily and be ready for the next round.
[/quote]


if were fortunate enough to make the playoffs and we get coldspring the first round i will GLADLY take that bet sir, you name the amount!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, give the Horns credit they ARE a good team and really controlled the game at the line of scrimmage. I really think it will come down to them and BC for the last playoff spot. Yes, the Mustangs were flat (maybe it was the homecoming aspect, who knows). However, NO team goes the entire season without being flat one week at least. The mark of a good team is that they WIN those games and we did. One thing for sure, if we don't take out shots downfield a little more in the passing game other teams are gonna play in the box more and our offense will have a hard time moving the ball. The Stangs are still a good team, seaching to be a great team.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see the stats from the WOS and HF game. But without seeing them I still cant see OF winning this game. They are a firery scrapy team. But even though the Silsbee OF scores were close. It really wasnt that close. Silsbees Defense pretty much dominated their Offense. And Silsbees Offense did move up and down the field fairly easily. And OF stopped them in the red zone. One caused a fumble inside the 5 and resulted in the only score OF had. I really do like OF. I just dont think they can Match WOS. This is a prediction and in no way am I against OF.  Just from what I saw against Jasper And Silsbee. I have to go with WOS. I wish they prove me wrong I will be glad to be wrong on this one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look people the horns came to play last night and played hard and well, but im telling you it was a case of over looking your opponent last night! The stangs OC came out throwng the ball and trying to work on things on the first drive!!! I will bet anyone any amount of money that lindsey will touch the ball every play until the bobcats prove they can stop him! And as long as our middle linebacker lynch is okay and not injured badly the defense will be better than ever! The stangs still have a speed advantage everywhere in this game! I look for the special teams from WOS to keep providing us with points and great field position.

Stangs win 24-7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="speveto" post="1077960" timestamp="1318163711"]
[quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=89495.msg1077127#msg1077127 date=1318086993]
WOS                28
Orangefield        0
[/quote]I know this post is ment to be a joke but it is "NOT FUNNY".  If Orangefield wins it will not be an "UP-SET".
[/quote]


No joke, that's exactly how I see it going down.

If the Tiger defense can keep Orangefield's offense out of the endzone, then I fully expect the Chain Gang defense to do the same.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Gasilla" post="1078023" timestamp="1318170180"]
Very true, in all 3 of our losses we outgained our opponents. In Giddings we nearly tripled theirs and still lost by 8. Stats are for losers, period... Scoreboard baby!
[/quote] Thats very true and thats what I was wanting to see. Just how that game played.  Thats it. Im fully aware of how stats work. And I listen to the giddings game. I was aware of what took place in that game. But was trying to figure out why the score was close against HF.  In order to make my prediction thats it. So I do use stats In my own way I dont use them in a way that dosnt make sence. And I dont consider myself a loser but I will look at stats to make my own assumption of what was going on with a particular game Win or lose. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="CATS80" post="1078060" timestamp="1318173952"]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=89495.msg1078023#msg1078023 date=1318170180]
Very true, in all 3 of our losses we outgained our opponents. In Giddings we nearly tripled theirs and still lost by 8. Stats are for losers, period... Scoreboard baby!
[/quote] Thats very true and thats what I was wanting to see. Just how that game played.  Thats it. Im fully aware of how stats work. And I listen to the giddings game. I was aware of what took place in that game. But was trying to figure out why the score was close against HF.  In order to make my prediction thats it. So I do use stats In my own way I dont use them in a way that dosnt make sence. And I dont consider myself a loser but I will look at stats to make my own assumption of what was going on with a particular game Win or lose.
[/quote]


Gas wasn't calling you a loser. He was just being funny.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="kicker" post="1078066" timestamp="1318174250"]
[quote author=CATS80 link=topic=89495.msg1078060#msg1078060 date=1318173952]
[quote author=Gasilla link=topic=89495.msg1078023#msg1078023 date=1318170180]
Very true, in all 3 of our losses we outgained our opponents. In Giddings we nearly tripled theirs and still lost by 8. Stats are for losers, period... Scoreboard baby!
[/quote] Thats very true and thats what I was wanting to see. Just how that game played.  Thats it. Im fully aware of how stats work. And I listen to the giddings game. I was aware of what took place in that game. But was trying to figure out why the score was close against HF.  In order to make my prediction thats it. So I do use stats In my own way I dont use them in a way that dosnt make sence. And I dont consider myself a loser but I will look at stats to make my own assumption of what was going on with a particular game Win or lose.
[/quote]


Gas wasn't calling you a loser. He was just being funny.
[/quote] I just think they took it wrong of what I was wanting to see stats for. Because if some one runs up and down the field all night. and the defense holds the oponents offense to hardly nothing . I would not bet against that team in the next game. no matter how the score looked. Just like the WOS game against Giddings.  WOS  Whipped that But all night in every way but the score. So did WOS lose? Yes. But would I bet against Them if the same game was played the following week.  Heck no.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:( :( down deep i feel like the mustangs will win agnest  orangefield BUT there is still trouble in mustange land i just cant to the life of me figer this out. alot of people on here have said that wo-s is not playing as a team like thay should and others are putting the finger on the OC play calling this all might be true the scary thing is that the mustangs are running out of time to get all this togather. to the life of me i cant understand WHY our little QB will not take off upfield on the roll out when his rec is coverd by two guys he can run for 20 are more yards and use the sideline if he see that he is going to be blasterd just step out of bounds .silsbee had a QB last year that did that very well and got big yardage now i will shut the hell up had to get that off my chest sorry guys
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
    • Got my hotel booked...an hour away. They're having some kind of Light festival, so busy times in Nat.
    • payton missed dunk , and they go get a layup that play hurt 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...