Jump to content

20-4A Playoff picture- 1 game to play


Recommended Posts

[b]20-4A                 
Team                    W  L [/b]    [b]Remaining game[/b]
x-Nederland          6  0          @LCM
x-Vidor                4  2          Livingston   
x-PN-G                4  2          Central
Livingston            4  2          @ Vidor
Ozen                  3  3          Lumberton
[s]Central[/s]                1  5          @PNG
[s]LC-M [/s]                  1  5          Nederland
[s]Lumberton[/s]            1  5          Ozen
 
x- Clinched playoff berth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="pirate68" post="1098410" timestamp="1319860129"]
Ned,Vidor,and Png are all in I believe because all have beaten Ozen head to head....Livingston has to beat Vidor are Ozen is in because they lost to Ozen...Someone correct this if I am wrong.
[/quote]

If PNG loses to Central, you could have a 3 way tie with PNG, Ozen, and the winner of Liv/Vidor.  Then it would come down to point differential
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vidor                  4  2            Ozen +7, PNG -7, Liv ?
Livingston            4  2            Ozen -1, PNG + 14, Liv ?
PN-G                  4  2            Liv -14, Ozen +17, Vidor +7= +7
Ozen                  3  3            Vidor -7, PNG-17, Liv +1= -20

In a 3 way tie-

Winner of Liv/Vidor is in.  If Liv loses they are +13, PNG is +3, Ozen is -16. If Vidor loses they are at 0, PNG +24, Ozen -24.  In any 3 way tie senario Ozen is out based on points.  The only way this could happen is if Central actually decides to show up next week and beats PNG. 

In a 2 way tie

Vidor- Win and they are in
PNG-Win and they are in
Liv- Win and they are in
Ozen- Win, PNG win, Liv loss

According to this(not sure if I'm correct) Vidor and PNG are in the playoffs.  If you go by points, Ozen has too great of a deficit to overcome.  Head to Head Vidor gets in over Ozen.  The only playoff spot up for grabs is between Liv/Ozen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[size=12pt][b]Clear as mud??[/b][/size]


Anyone agree or disagree?  All I know is my head hurts from thinking and it sucks that another football season is almost over.  It always goes by way too fast!  Hopefully some of these teams can make a long playoff run to extend it a little longer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you count PNG in the playoffs already based on their record. If you say the ties go by head to head then Livingston should be ahead of PNG due to PNG's loss to Livingston. It's my understanding from talking with UIL athletics that the head to head issue with ties in district standings was dimantled a year ago and strictly goes by total points scored in district competition. Just a few thoughts. The Livingston vs Vidor game should be a good one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Lion56" post="1098822" timestamp="1319898696"]
How do you count PNG in the playoffs already based on their record. If you say the ties go by head to head then Livingston should be ahead of PNG due to PNG's loss to Livingston. It's my understanding from talking with UIL athletics that the head to head issue with ties in district standings was dimantled a year ago and strictly goes by total points scored in district competition. Just a few thoughts. The Livingston vs Vidor game should be a good one.
[/quote]

If PNG wins and Ozen wins, this creates a 3 way tie.  PNG will get in based on points and Ozen is out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not certain, but pretty sure that Nederland and Vidor are already the div 1 reps...png will be div 2, just not certain if as the 1 or 2 seed, depending on the Vidor/Livingston outcome...if Livingston wins, they tie with png and get the top seed based on the head up match up...should Vidor win and Ozen win, then Ozen gets in and png will be the 1 seed, Ozen 2.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Lion56" post="1098822" timestamp="1319898696"]
How do you count PNG in the playoffs already based on their record. If you say the ties go by head to head then Livingston should be ahead of PNG due to PNG's loss to Livingston. It's my understanding from talking with UIL athletics that the head to head issue with ties in district standings was dimantled a year ago and strictly goes by total points scored in district competition.
[/quote]

Not the case, the UIL DOES NOT have a tiebreaker system that is used state wide, they specifically state that the method of breaking ties is left strictly up to the executive committees of the individual districts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the language:  "(h) TIES. The district executive committee shall determine in writing prior to the season the method to determine the district representatives in the event two or more schools are tied in win/loss percentages."

http://www.uiltexas.org/files/athletics/manuals/dec-handbook.pdf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,992
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    praise086
    Newest Member
    praise086
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s a fact.  Are you not bothered with those?  Big girl also has an issue with facts.  Must be a liberal thing!
    • That’s kinda over-simplifying matters.    Are you talking about local politics or the platforms of the DNC/RNC? They’re two completely different scenarios.    To be frank, a politician couldn’t get elected in Hardin County as a Republican… until 2010-2011 when the locals all switched to the R Party.    I think that the truest example of a Democrat is the late George Wallace, Governor of Alabama. He ran in 1958 against a staunch segregationist and lost big time. Both Dems, btw. He came back in 1962 as a hardcore opponent of integration and won handily, becoming the racist spokesperson for a South that wanted to remain segregated. By 1982 he won his last term as Governor of alabama, still as a democrat, but carrying over 90% of the black vote.    Who switched? Was it the party? The politicians? The people? All of the above, in all different directions and over a period of about 60 years.   The problem with arguments about switching is that there are no constants.  We all know that guy…. southern accent, white-headed flat top haircut, short sleeve western shirt with those old wrangler double-knit pants. He probably held public office all over the south, and he had some really crazy ideas about race…. Might not have been in the Klan, but knew a bunch of people who were or had been. And he voted 100% Democrat.     We can all say “yeah, and he became a Republican after the civil rights act was passed!” And we’d be wrong.  The truth is that those old ideals and ways of thinking pretty much died off.    The truth of the matter is that the civil rights act passed the senate with a 71-29 vote majority.  But it’s interesting to point out that the 71 “yes” votes were actually 27 Republicans and 44 Democrats voting “for” the civil rights act, with 6 Republicans and 21 Democrats voting against the Civil Rights Act.  So which party was in favor and which one opposed?   And now 60 years later, with an ideological split in America, both sides are trying to claim moral superiority and cast blame over history that, to be frank, we don’t understand.    But to be honest, the Democrat party of 2024 is not what it was… and neither is the Republican. Just because things are so black-and -white today doesn’t mean that they always have been. 
    • We wont win the series, but it would be nice to get a win today before heading to Baltimore. 
    • Like who?  Do you have any names of actual applicants? Asking because I have not seen a list of applicants. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...