Jump to content

Should Nederland Rest Starters?


GoDogs27

Recommended Posts

In Coach Neuman's interview after the win Friday night, he was asked specifically if he would sit some starters for next week's game against LCM and his answer was an emphatic "NO".

I see him playing his first team guys the first half and no matter the score, possibly sit them the whole second half.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking about the same thing this weekend.  I agree that they need to play the first half or so in order to keep the rust off.  After that sit them, there's no reason to get someone hurt in a game with no impact on the season.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pirate_pride_07
[quote name="tvc184" post="1100404" timestamp="1320051271"]
I am wondering how many people are putting the horse before the cart and assuming that the game will be over by the half.
[/quote]
I was beginning to wonder the same thing myself tvc.  8)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope it is over after first quarter so some guys can heal up. I know Brock wants to play because he missed last week . I do think the team wants to be perfect in District and if they could go back and play BH with all the starters in the game they would in a heartbeat.
Great drive in this group of young men.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Bulldog8" post="1099876" timestamp="1319996926"]
They all should play unless they have a nagging injury that could get better by resting. Also mix the starters with 2nd and 3rd teamers to keep some continuity
[/quote]This would be the logical think for Big Ned to do in this situation, IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah rest starters  & mix 2nd,3rd teamers?hell why not put a few 9th graders in they are better than some of the 2nd & 3rd string. good thing u guys dont coach,dont change nothing play to win like all year.if a guy is hurt dont play.nederland is a tough,bring it hard every play,never rest in your face team,resting starters doesnt  fit nederlands mentality.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="diego cruz" post="1100466" timestamp="1320066420"]
yeah rest starters  & mix 2nd,3rd teamers?heck why not put a few 9th graders in they are better than some of the 2nd & 3rd string. good thing u guys dont coach,dont change nothing play to win like all year.if a guy is hurt dont play.nederland is a tough,bring it hard every play,never rest in your face team,resting starters doesnt  fit nederlands mentality.
[/quote]

I agree up to a point, I know the Coach and his players will want to win out in District, and IF they get a comfortable lead I don't think Neumann will risk losing a starter to injury this close to the  playoffs.  Especially given our injury history the last few years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You continue to play to win...if the opportunity presents itself, you play more guys than you normally would, but only if you can...you do not want to go into the playoffs on a losing note and it would be that much sweeter to be UNDEFEATED district champs...it's OK and probably wise to limit players who may be dinged up a bit, but all healthy hands on deck and let's finish what we started...besides, these kids want to play, whether hurt or not, so I say let them play so long as it doesn't do anything to hurt you in the playoffs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...