Jump to content

Coldspring-Oakhurst vs. Bridge City


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It seems that people are saying coldspring is the best thing theve seen since color tv. I hope they underestimate BC. Those boys are winners and they play downright hard. This will not be a blowout. As a matter of fact, I say BC can win this. Any team that plays Coldspring's schedule would look good. I'm not saying they aren't a great team, I'm just saying that this song and dance is heard every year from different teams. I.e. Brownwood last year. Sorry guys, I don't buy CS being the ultimate team.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

monrow on a pitch right and gilbert left pitch that is COLDSPRINGS (BREAD and BUTTER) IF bridge city plays smart football and get off there blocks who know what might happen  oh heck i almost forgot lilley there QB  he relly dose not have all that strong of a arm maybe the cards can have bread and butter for supper if thay play smart heads up football        GO GET THEM BRIDGE CITY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My comment has nothing to do with Cleveland or even WOS for that matter. That's a different topic totally. I posted on the BC thread and stated that the almighty Coldspring is not going to run over Bridge City. I worry about no one. I've seen too many teams over the years think they are the second coming, only to get beat early. I'm stating that BC will fight to the end and could pull it out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="skipper" post="1107171" timestamp="1320618676"]
CHS96 the same can be said about coldspings dont you think Kicker
[/quote]

Well, seems to me that they are already looking at stadiums to book for round two. I believe Bridge City will have a say in that.  ;)

I have a funny feeling about this game. If their more worried about round two or three, something tells me that the only thing they will be looking to book is which basketball tournaments to play in. LOL.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="kicker" post="1107169" timestamp="1320618472"]
My comment has nothing to do with Cleveland or even WOS for that matter. That's a different topic totally. I posted on the BC thread and stated that the almighty Coldspring is not going to run over Bridge City. I worry about no one. I've seen too many teams over the years think they are the second coming, only to get beat early. I'm stating that BC will fight to the end and could pull it out.
[/quote]

I Have to agree with Kicker...There's no such thing as an unbeatable team...And I'm pulling for Bridge City in this one... ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't represent the whole team or fan base. I'm just one fan. I say CS will win by 3 + td's.  Last yr BC talked the same crap and got the same butt kicking handed to them. What make this yr any different. You guys got a better team this yr?  Well our team is better than last yr also.  If BC beat CS I will follow BC to ever game and root for them. How many CS haters can say the same ????  ( I will also buy the popcorn)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...