Jump to content

Nederland vs. Pearland Dawson


Puma42

Recommended Posts

[quote name="football04" post="1128720" timestamp="1322100049"]
[quote author=bulldawg64 link=topic=91896.msg1128605#msg1128605 date=1322092418]
[b]dawson has beat only 3 teams with a [/b]
[b]winning record[/b].clear springs 8-4,crosby 6-5,
houston reagan 7-5,lost to the other 2,
lamarque 10-2,manvel 12-0.[b]beat these under 500 [/b]
[b]teams [/b] .oak ridge 1-9,galveston ball 0-10,
santa fe  3-7,friendswood 4-7,texas city 4-6,
houston nimitz 4-7, lamar consolidated 5-6.
we will see saturday night!

                        [b][i] GO DOGS!![/i][/b]
[/quote]
That's good stuff , this is going to be a great game, I hope Nederland can get rid of the turn over bug. I hope we jump a couple of those bubble screens with pick 6's
[/quote]
Dawson will pound da ball first to pull ya in da box then hit those screens  ;) Just stay in front and give em 2 yrds  ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This will be a tough game. Dawson has a great team and is by far the best opponent we have played in my opinion. The experts are picking us to lose big, but I think the Dogs are gonna play their best game of the year! This is a very resilient team that never quits. Keep it going Dogs! Make us proud!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="thedogs1987" post="1128770" timestamp="1322108059"]
Perhaps, PD will be the one putting the ball on the ground and T/O.  How good is their special teams play anyway????

Dogs just need to play like they have all year -  Making it happen against all odds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


GO DOGS!!!!!!!!!! ;)
[/quote]

Kicking not so good but in the return game

Crenshaw has two kickoffs for touchdowns and 2 punts for touchdown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="dhseagle11" post="1128069" timestamp="1322028760"]
We will find out, but a great defense can only take you so far. Dawson defense is no slack either. They can cause turnovers with Jarell Crenshaw and etc. This team is based off of speed and it will be hard for nederland to keep up

Dawson could either win 42-14 or 21-14
[/quote]

I guess the Dogs should just stay home...you may be understating, Dawson 95, Nederland 2...how's that sound?

Really, I will stick with the Dogs, 30-28.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,992
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    praise086
    Newest Member
    praise086
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s a fact.  Are you not bothered with those?  Big girl also has an issue with facts.  Must be a liberal thing!
    • That’s kinda over-simplifying matters.    Are you talking about local politics or the platforms of the DNC/RNC? They’re two completely different scenarios.    To be frank, a politician couldn’t get elected in Hardin County as a Republican… until 2010-2011 when the locals all switched to the R Party.    I think that the truest example of a Democrat is the late George Wallace, Governor of Alabama. He ran in 1958 against a staunch segregationist and lost big time. Both Dems, btw. He came back in 1962 as a hardcore opponent of integration and won handily, becoming the racist spokesperson for a South that wanted to remain segregated. By 1982 he won his last term as Governor of alabama, still as a democrat, but carrying over 90% of the black vote.    Who switched? Was it the party? The politicians? The people? All of the above, in all different directions and over a period of about 60 years.   The problem with arguments about switching is that there are no constants.  We all know that guy…. southern accent, white-headed flat top haircut, short sleeve western shirt with those old wrangler double-knit pants. He probably held public office all over the south, and he had some really crazy ideas about race…. Might not have been in the Klan, but knew a bunch of people who were or had been. And he voted 100% Democrat.     We can all say “yeah, and he became a Republican after the civil rights act was passed!” And we’d be wrong.  The truth is that those old ideals and ways of thinking pretty much died off.    The truth of the matter is that the civil rights act passed the senate with a 71-29 vote majority.  But it’s interesting to point out that the 71 “yes” votes were actually 27 Republicans and 44 Democrats voting “for” the civil rights act, with 6 Republicans and 21 Democrats voting against the Civil Rights Act.  So which party was in favor and which one opposed?   And now 60 years later, with an ideological split in America, both sides are trying to claim moral superiority and cast blame over history that, to be frank, we don’t understand.    But to be honest, the Democrat party of 2024 is not what it was… and neither is the Republican. Just because things are so black-and -white today doesn’t mean that they always have been. 
    • We wont win the series, but it would be nice to get a win today before heading to Baltimore. 
    • Like who?  Do you have any names of actual applicants? Asking because I have not seen a list of applicants. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...