BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Central - 8LC-M - 10end of the first period
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Central - 21LC-M - 18HalftimeCentral's big man Ellis with a 3 at the buzzer
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 We'll get it going in the second half. LC-M have given their best and they're losing @ halftime. Lets hope I'm right. Second half starts in 1 min.
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Update. Central player Garrison Mitchell not playing. In street clothes.
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Dunk count # 1. And one finish for K.Smith over the Bear player.
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Central - 35LC-M - 27end of the third period
asary Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Good win.........sets up another great game for Feb 3 ;)
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 This game honestly could have been blown open again. Missed layups and free throws killed us. We can't do that Friday and expect to win. We don't cherish our possessions. We do stupid stuff and dumb turnovers.If we treat our possessions like it's our last, I like a deep playoff run..
LCMBIGFan Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 I was about to agree with you when I saw you were talking about Central. I thought LCM missed too many shots under the goal and should have won. I do agree that Central missed too many shots and LCM avoided a bigger margin loss.
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name="LCMBIGFan" post="1169320" timestamp="1328068693"]I was about to agree with you when I saw you were talking about Central. I thought LCM missed too many shots under the goal and should have won. I do agree that Central missed too many shots and LCM avoided a bigger margin loss. [/quote]Those big men of yalls are legit. It's just hard for them to operate when there is no spacing. The guards are not very good. They are not a big threat from the outside and they are not a threat to penetrate, so, we sag into the big men because we know that's all you have. Now, the Bear guards DID play better in this meeting than the last one. They didn't turn the ball over nearly as much as they did the first time. Good Luck to LC-M. They will beat Livingston and make the playoffs.
Honest Abe Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="1169158" timestamp="1328064109"]Central - 46LC-M - 37Final[/quote]Definitely tough to play at The Bear's Den. Good win Jags! Keep your heads up LCM!
Lazeek Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Nice win Jags..........showdown on Friday night with the Bulldogs!!!
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/sports/hs/article/Central-boys-top-LC-M-2890621.php
stevenash Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name="LAZEEK" post="1169364" timestamp="1328071146"]Nice win Jags..........showdown on Friday night with the Bulldogs!!![/quote]Any dunks in this one? ;D
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 You're supposed to be paying attention to the thread, Stevenash! I'm disapointed in you! ;D ;DCentral - 1 (arguably 2 since there was a Bear defender really close)LC-M - 0
BLUEDOVE3 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="1169338" timestamp="1328069712"][quote author=LCMBIGFan link=topic=95246.msg1169320#msg date=1328068693]I was about to agree with you when I saw you were talking about Central. I thought LCM missed too many shots under the goal and should have won. I do agree that Central missed too many shots and LCM avoided a bigger margin loss. [/quote]Those big men of yalls are legit. It's just hard for them to operate when there is no spacing. The guards are not very good. They are not a big threat from the outside and they are not a threat to penetrate, so, we sag into the big men because we know that's all you have. Now, the Bear guards DID play better in this meeting than the last one. They didn't turn the ball over nearly as much as they did the first time. Good Luck to LC-M. They will beat Livingston and make the playoffs.[/quote]Ws the big fella in better shape this time? Looked like he was tired Ozen's first meeting this year.
BMTSoulja1 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 [quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1169745" timestamp="1328119938"][quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=95246.msg1169338#msg1169338 date=1328069712][quote author=LCMBIGFan link=topic=95246.msg1169320#msg date=1328068693]I was about to agree with you when I saw you were talking about Central. I thought LCM missed too many shots under the goal and should have won. I do agree that Central missed too many shots and LCM avoided a bigger margin loss. [/quote]Those big men of yalls are legit. It's just hard for them to operate when there is no spacing. The guards are not very good. They are not a big threat from the outside and they are not a threat to penetrate, so, we sag into the big men because we know that's all you have. Now, the Bear guards DID play better in this meeting than the last one. They didn't turn the ball over nearly as much as they did the first time. Good Luck to LC-M. They will beat Livingston and make the playoffs.[/quote]Ws the big fella in better shape this time? Looked like he was tired Ozen's first meeting this year.[/quote]That guy's a real big man. He's 6'7", but he is close to 275 lbs. He's no sprinter and not built to run up and down the floor against superior athletes. So, the answer to your question is yes, he was winded and tired. The smaller big for LC-M looked in shape.
BLUEDOVE3 Posted February 1, 2012 Report Posted February 1, 2012 Another *trained* eye in the bunch of bleacher coaches on this site ;)
Recommended Posts