lamar73! Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 [quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1178769" timestamp="1329338201"][quote author=lamar73! link=topic=96046.msg1178748#msg1178748 date=1329337311]Silsbee conceded their way around Ricky Seal Jones. He is nasty![/quote]Yes right into a Brookshire Royal team that has two '6"6 post players and swept Jones' Sealy team in district by scores of 101-81 and 86-70. ;) ::)The concession had more to do with Silsbee wanting to lineup a particular warm up opponent and prepare them for some match up problems than the route thru the brackets.[/quote][u]Brookshire Royal[/u]Ray Johnson 6'6" [b]ppg 10 rb 6 bl 1[/b]Kenton Sams 6'5" [b]ppg12 rb 4 bl 1[/b][u]Sealy[/u]Ricky Seals-Jones 6'6" [b]ppg 32 rb 14.7 bl 2[/b] :o
FanintheStands Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 You know, on another note, I've been amazed at Hardin Jefferson's consistency this year. What do I mean? Well, look at the scores of the teams that they have played more than once, but more importantly, look at the repeatability of those deficits against the same team.Little Cypress-Mauriceville, 55-34 (21)Little Cypress-Mauriceville, 59-47 (12)Little Cypress-Mauriceville, 75-37 (38)Little Cypress-Mauriceville, 52-38 (24)Hamshire-Fannett, 74-41 (33)Hamshire-Fannett, 84-53* (31)Hamshire-Fannett, 82-48* (34)[color=red]Silsbee, 56-59* (-3)[/color]Silsbee, 79-74* (5)Orangefield, 74-29* (45)Orangefield, 75-39* (36)West Orange-Stark, 77-45* (32)West Orange-Stark, 76-48* (28)Feb. 10 - at Bridge City, 78-43* (35)Jan. 24 - Bridge City, 82-46* (38)Other than Little Cypress Mauriceville, these margins have been rather consistent, in my opinion. I think this says something about how well they are prepared for each game.
FanintheStands Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 [quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1179349" timestamp="1329408618"]OMG ::) :-X[/quote]Admit it, you're so envious of HJ, you should have been named "GreenDove" ;)
BLUEDOVE3 Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 [quote name="FanintheStands" post="1179353" timestamp="1329408738"][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179349#msg1179349 date=1329408618]OMG ::) :-X[/quote]Admit it, you're so envious of HJ, you should have been named "GreenDove" ;)[/quote]YES! I ADMIT IT!!! 8)
WOSgrad Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 [quote name="FanintheStands" post="1179353" timestamp="1329408738"][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179349#msg1179349 date=1329408618]OMG ::) :-X[/quote]Admit it, you're so envious of HJ, you should have been named "GreenDove" ;)[/quote][img]http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg560/scaled.php?server=560&filename=laughgh.jpg&res=medium[/img]
PoppaBearstarr Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 Dont leave grad out he is envious too.... :)
PoppaBearstarr Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 It's ok Grad I'm envious of WOS track, and football for sure...
FanintheStands Posted February 16, 2012 Report Posted February 16, 2012 [quote name="PoppaBearstarr" post="1179541" timestamp="1329423693"]Dont leave grad out he is envious too.... :)[/quote]Maybe so, but he's got a Calvin and Hobbes kind of sense of humor.He can't be all bad! ;D
bmrm Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="lamar73!" post="1179214" timestamp="1329400191"][quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=96046.msg1178769#msg1178769 date=1329338201][quote author=lamar73! link=topic=96046.msg1178748#msg1178748 date=1329337311]Silsbee conceded their way around Ricky Seal Jones. He is nasty![/quote]Yes right into a Brookshire Royal team that has two '6"6 post players and swept Jones' Sealy team in district by scores of 101-81 and 86-70. ;) ::)The concession had more to do with Silsbee wanting to lineup a particular warm up opponent and prepare them for some match up problems than the route thru the brackets.[/quote][u]Brookshire Royal[/u]Ray Johnson 6'6" [b]ppg 10 rb 6 bl 1[/b]Kenton Sams 6'5" [b]ppg12 rb 4 bl 1[/b][u]Sealy[/u]Ricky Seals-Jones 6'6" [b]ppg 32 rb 14.7 bl 2[/b] :o[/quote]HJ will have their hands full should they have to face Seals-Jones & Sealy.
BLUEDOVE3 Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 Their off season running and schedule will get them thru it ;)
stevenash Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1179810" timestamp="1329486096"]Their off season running and schedule will get them thru it ;)[/quote]Translation= " I can't stand it when something I dont approve of works for someone else"
BLUEDOVE3 Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="stevenash" post="1179883" timestamp="1329490196"][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179810#msg1179810 date=1329486096]Their off season running and schedule will get them thru it ;)[/quote]Translation= " I can't stand it when something I dont approve of works for someone else"[/quote]No Nash, I think off season running is good.
stevenash Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1179886" timestamp="1329490396"][quote author=stevenash link=topic=96046.msg1179883#msg1179883 date=1329490196][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179810#msg1179810 date=1329486096]Their off season running and schedule will get them thru it ;)[/quote]Translation= " I can't stand it when something I dont approve of works for someone else"[/quote]No Nash, I think off season running is good.[/quote]I stand corrected ( and shocked)
Dick Vitale Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="stevenash" post="1179895" timestamp="1329491175"][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179886#msg1179886 date=1329490396][quote author=stevenash link=topic=96046.msg1179883#msg1179883 date=1329490196][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179810#msg1179810 date=1329486096]Their off season running and schedule will get them thru it ;)[/quote]Translation= " I can't stand it when something I dont approve of works for someone else"[/quote]No Nash, I think off season running is good.[/quote]I stand corrected ( and shocked)[/quote]YOU TWO AGREED? Now, THAT is shocking!!!! ;D
BLUEDOVE3 Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 Now lets discuss HJ's schedule. Now thats a whole different subject matter separate from the running. I mean, why get in shape :o ;D ;D
Honest Abe Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="bmrm" post="1179772" timestamp="1329451442"][quote author=lamar73! link=topic=96046.msg1179214#msg1179214 date=1329400191][quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=96046.msg1178769#msg1178769 date=1329338201][quote author=lamar73! link=topic=96046.msg1178748#msg1178748 date=1329337311]Silsbee conceded their way around Ricky Seal Jones. He is nasty![/quote]Yes right into a Brookshire Royal team that has two '6"6 post players and swept Jones' Sealy team in district by scores of 101-81 and 86-70. ;) ::)The concession had more to do with Silsbee wanting to lineup a particular warm up opponent and prepare them for some match up problems than the route thru the brackets.[/quote][u]Brookshire Royal[/u]Ray Johnson 6'6" [b]ppg 10 rb 6 bl 1[/b]Kenton Sams 6'5" [b]ppg12 rb 4 bl 1[/b][u]Sealy[/u]Ricky Seals-Jones 6'6" [b]ppg 32 rb 14.7 bl 2[/b] :o[/quote]HJ will have their hands full should they have to face Seals-Jones & Sealy. [/quote]HJ will be fine against Sealy. Brookshire Royal beat them by 20 at home and 16 at Sealy. If Royal is 18 points better than Sealy, then Sealy should not be much of a threat. Sounds like the big kid carries them in most games. He had 38 and 36 in both losses to Royal. You average 37 against a good team and lose, that shows you don't have much help, IMO.
FanintheStands Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="NB-Dawg" post="1179929" timestamp="1329494220"][quote author=bmrm link=topic=96046.msg1179772#msg1179772 date=1329451442][quote author=lamar73! link=topic=96046.msg1179214#msg1179214 date=1329400191][quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=96046.msg1178769#msg1178769 date=1329338201][quote author=lamar73! link=topic=96046.msg1178748#msg1178748 date=1329337311]Silsbee conceded their way around Ricky Seal Jones. He is nasty![/quote]Yes right into a Brookshire Royal team that has two '6"6 post players and swept Jones' Sealy team in district by scores of 101-81 and 86-70. ;) ::)The concession had more to do with Silsbee wanting to lineup a particular warm up opponent and prepare them for some match up problems than the route thru the brackets.[/quote][u]Brookshire Royal[/u]Ray Johnson 6'6" [b]ppg 10 rb 6 bl 1[/b]Kenton Sams 6'5" [b]ppg12 rb 4 bl 1[/b][u]Sealy[/u]Ricky Seals-Jones 6'6" [b]ppg 32 rb 14.7 bl 2[/b] :o[/quote]HJ will have their hands full should they have to face Seals-Jones & Sealy. [/quote]HJ will be fine against Sealy. Brookshire Royal beat them by 20 at home and 16 at Sealy. If Royal is 18 points better than Sealy, then Sealy should not be much of a threat. Sounds like the big kid carries them in most games. He had 38 and 36 in both losses to Royal. You average 37 against a good team and lose, that shows you don't have much help, IMO.[/quote]My goodness, if you score 38 points against those Twin Towers from BR and you gotta wonder if those two guys are any good. I'm liking Silsbee's chances against those guys if that is the case.
stevenash Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1179900" timestamp="1329491539"]Now lets discuss HJ's schedule. Now thats a whole different subject matter separate from the running. I mean, why get in shape :o ;D ;D[/quote]It's already established how inferior HJs schedule was. Maybe that staff will learn some day how to handle the schedule. They need to read this board more often.
Dick Vitale Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="stevenash" post="1179939" timestamp="1329495138"][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179900#msg1179900 date=1329491539]Now lets discuss HJ's schedule. Now thats a whole different subject matter separate from the running. I mean, why get in shape :o ;D ;D[/quote]It's already established how inferior HJs schedule was. Maybe that staff will learn some day how to handle the schedule. They need to read this board more often.[/quote]Perhaps it is their goal in the pre season to play teams with similar intellect and athletic ability... ::)
stevenash Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="Dick Vitale" post="1179940" timestamp="1329495266"][quote author=stevenash link=topic=96046.msg1179939#msg1179939 date=1329495138][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179900#msg1179900 date=1329491539]Now lets discuss HJ's schedule. Now thats a whole different subject matter separate from the running. I mean, why get in shape :o ;D ;D[/quote]It's already established how inferior HJs schedule was. Maybe that staff will learn some day how to handle the schedule. They need to read this board more often.[/quote]Perhaps it is their goal in the pre season to play teams with similar intellect and athletic ability... ::)[/quote]The record(s) suggest that their approach is a productive one and there is no way to spin it otherwise.
Dick Vitale Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="stevenash" post="1179944" timestamp="1329495569"][quote author=Dick Vitale link=topic=96046.msg1179940#msg1179940 date=1329495266][quote author=stevenash link=topic=96046.msg1179939#msg1179939 date=1329495138][quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=96046.msg1179900#msg1179900 date=1329491539]Now lets discuss HJ's schedule. Now thats a whole different subject matter separate from the running. I mean, why get in shape :o ;D ;D[/quote]It's already established how inferior HJs schedule was. Maybe that staff will learn some day how to handle the schedule. They need to read this board more often.[/quote]Perhaps it is their goal in the pre season to play teams with similar intellect and athletic ability... ::)[/quote]The record(s) suggest that their approach is a productive one and there is no way to spin it otherwise.[/quote]Of course it is, never doubted that for one minute.... ::)
stevenash Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 Before your "glorious" return to this board, there were several experts(self perceived, of course) that voiced multiple complaints about how the inferior schedule of HJ as compared to other area notables would be a detriment. HJs record against those notables says that claim had no credibility in the least.
Dick Vitale Posted February 17, 2012 Report Posted February 17, 2012 [quote name="stevenash" post="1179950" timestamp="1329495970"]Before your "glorious" return to this board, there were several experts(self perceived, of course) that voiced multiple complaints about how the inferior schedule of HJ as compared to other area notables would be a detriment. HJs record against those notables says that claim had no credibility in the least.[/quote]Ohhh, I see..perhaps my "glorious" return should have come earlier, so that me, in my infinite wisdom, could have refuted those claims about HJ's "soft as wet tissue paper" schedule in the pre-district... 8)
Recommended Posts