Jump to content

West Brook Tourny Scores


Recommended Posts

Game 1 Day 1

West Brook 21

Hemphill 1

3 innings -- run rule

WP - Fisher (1-0)

Game 2

Brazoswood 4

PN-G 3

Game 3

Brazoswood 13

Hemphill 1

Game 4

Lake Charles Barbe 7

Lufkin 0

Game 5

West Brook 11

Lufkin 3

Day 2 Scores....

PN-G 7

Hemphill 0

Brazoswood 10

West Brook 4

Lake Charles Barbe 13

PN-G 0

Lufkin 13

Hemphill 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Props to 2A Hemphill for even competing in this tournament with 5A's and 4A's. This will make them stronger when they start district!!!

Agreed. Even though the score doesn't indicate, the Hornets played hard the entire game. They are also very young (lot of soph and fresh on their varsity).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DETAILS OF WEST BROOK GAMES (Thursday):

HEMPHILL 1 0 0 = 1 1 3

WB 6 15 x = 21 15 0

WP -- Fisher (1-0) 3 IP, 1 R, 1 ER, 7 K, 1 BB

LP -- Clark

Calvert 1-2, 1 R, 1 3B

McBryde 2-2, 1 R, 1 2B, 3 RBI

Lycan - 2-3, BB, 2 R, 1 2B, 3 RBI

Serna - 1-1, BB, 2 R, 1 2B, 1 RBI

Chaisson 1-2, 1 R, 1 2B, 1 RBI

Falgout - 1-2, RE, 2 R, 1 2B, 1 RBI

Wilkinson 0-1

Ferguson - 0-1, BB, HBP, 2 R, 1RBI

Armstrong - 2-3, RE, 3 R, 1 3B, 2 RBI

Schwarzlose - 0-0, SACF, HBP, BB, 2 R

Murphy - 2-3, RE, 2 R, 1 2B, 1 RBI

Balfanz - 2-2, 1 R, 1 3B, 2 RBI

Fisher - 1-1, 1 R, 1 RBI

LUFKIN 0 3 0 0 0 0 = 3 7 0

WB 5 0 0 0 6 x = 11 7 0

WP -- Tubbs (1-0) 3 2/3 IP, 0 R, 1 H, 4 K, 2 BB

Doubt (ND) 1 1/2 IP, 3 R, 5 H, 1 K, 2 BB (starter)

Crawford 1 IP, 0 R, 1 H, 1 K, 0 BB

LP -- Greening

HR - WB -- Murphy (1) -- 3 run HR in bottom of first

LF -- Nolan -- 3 run HR in top 2nd (accounts for all Lufkin runs)

Calvert 0-3, HBP, 1 R

Lycan 0-3, HBP, RE, 1 R

Serna, 1-3, BB, 2 R

Falgout, 1-2, HBP, 2 R, 1 2B, 2 RBI

Ferguson, 1-2, BB, 2 R

Armstrong, 2-3 1 R, 1 2B

Murphy, 1-1, 2 BB, 2 R, 1 HR, 3 RBI

Schwarzlose 1-3, 1 RBI

Balfanz, 0-3, FC, 1 R, 1 RBI

WEST BROOK NOW 6-1-1, WITH GAMES TODAY VS. BRAZOSWOOD (11:15 A.M.) AND LAKE CHARLES BARBE (8:15 P.M.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DETAILS FOR WEST BROOK (FRIDAY'S GAMES)

BRAZOSWOOD 10 WEST BROOK 4

Brazoswood 1 6 0 0 3 = 10 8 3

West Brook 2 0 0 1 1 = 4 6 5

WP: Stowers

LP: Svoboda (1 1/3IP, 7 R, 0 ER, 5 H, 1 BB)

Doubt (2 2/3IP, 0R, 1 H, 1 K, 2 BB)

Crawford 1/3IP, 3 R, 2 ER, 2 H)

Fisher (2/3 IP, 0R, 0 H, 1 BB)

NOTE: Only 2 of Brazoswood's 10 runs were earned.

Calvert 0-2, BB

Lycan 2-3, 1 2B

Serna 1-3, RE, 2 R

Falgout 0-2, BB, 1 R

Ferguson 1-3, RE, 1 R, 1 2B

Murphy 1-3, RE, 1 RBI

Armstrong 0-2, HBP

Wallace 1-2, 1 RBI

Balfanz 0-2

LAKE CHARLES BARBE 8 WEST BROOK 6

LC Barbe 0 2 0 0 1 0 5 = 8 10 2

West Brook 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 = 6 8 3

WP: Griffin (7 IP, 6 R, 8 K)

LP: Serna ( 6 2/3 IP, 8 R, 4 ER, 10 H, 3 K, 6 BB)

NOTE: WB loaded bases in bottom of 7th with 1 out but failed to score

Calvert 1-4

Lycan 1-3, 1 BB, 1 R, 1 2B

Serna 2-4, 1 R, 1 RBI, 1 3B

Falgout 1-4, 1 R

Ferguson 2-4, 2 R, 1 RBI, 1 2B

Armstrong 1-3

Murphy 0-3

Wallace 0-3

Balfanz 0-2, BB, 1 R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bigred99

Haven't seen the Indians play but LCM and PNG better not underestimate Nederland. They can swing a bat, got great speed and they are huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DETAILS FROM WEST BROOK VS. PNG (SAT.)

WEST BROOK 10 PNG 0

PNG 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 4 1

WB 3 0 3 4 X = 10 11 1

WP: Murphy (2-0) 5 IP, 4 H, 0 R, 4 K, 0 BB

LP: McInnis 2 IP, 7 H, 6 R, 6 ER, 0 K, 0 BB

Flores 2 IP, 3 H, 4 R, 4 ER, 1 K, 2 BB

PORT NECHES-GROVES

Powell 1-3

Harrington 0-2

Mire 0-2

Carnahan 1-2

McInnis 0-2, RE

Walker 1-2

Hearn 0-2

Harwood 0-2

Barnett 1-2

WEST BROOK

Calvert 0-2, BB, 1 R

Lycan 2-3, 2 R

Serna 3-3, 3 R, 3B, HR, 2 RBI

Falgout 3-3, 3 R, 3B, HR, 4 RBI

Ferguson 0-2, SAC, 2 RBI

Armstrong 2-3, 1 R, 2B, 1 RBI

Murphy 1-2, BB

Wallace 0-3, RE

Balfanz 0-2

Serna and Falgout HRs were 'back to back' in the 3rd inning. Murphy runs his record to 2-0 (with 1 save) and lowers his ERA to 0.47.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,995
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    janaxad4
    Newest Member
    janaxad4
    Joined


  • Posts

    • There are so many laws on ballots that it could probably be a degree course. Some say things like, you have to declare your party before January 1 each election year (so in the previous year) and you can’t change. So a potential candidate can’t declare to be a Democrat in December 2023 and then in May 2024 decide to file paperwork to run as a Republican. Each state is different though on dates (including actually different dates on “major” and “minor” parties), appeals, party affiliations, changes to the ballot by any means and so on. The Nevada alone for the 2023-2024 elections season is 9 pages with links to other pages.  The states combined might have thousands of pages of election information. The Texas Election Code has about 160…. Chapters. I could understand where a person could read a line or two and say, “Aha! That’s the answer” and ignore 567 pages. 
    • Congrats Horns. Could be a big season for yall coming up 
    • When did Woodville get a Jacob Hunter on the roster 😂 
    • And for what it’s worth, can we stop calling something we don’t agree with “a lie?” That’s literally what people are doing now, media included. If Trump says “I don’t think climate change is that big of a deal, some tree hugger will yell “he’s a liar!” And the talking heads will put another tic mark on the lie list. I saw the other day where some jerk researched trump’s presidency and said “he averaged 21 lies per day.” I agree that he’s a liar, but come on… 21 per day? They’re like “…then Trump said Biden is doing a bad job… another lie.”
    • That’s not a lie… in the buildup to the reversal of Roe v Wade, some states (like Texas) were putting in very restrictive abortion bans that would take effect on the off chance that Roe v Wade was overturned.   Other states (like Virginia) set in place rules even less restrictive than the ones in Roe v Wade…. And the Governor of Virginia was proud to say that abortion was legal right up until the baby was born.   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up FWIW, a state rep from Va authored a bill that would loosen restriction.  Asked to clarify, she said that a woman who was actively dialated would be able to request an abortion. After an uproar, she backtracked.  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up The headline of the article incorrectly states that trump’s statement was a lie… it’s not, IMO.   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...