Summer Creek/Galena Park Scrimmage Thread/Post comments here!

[SummerCreek it is!]

[quote name="HUM398" post="1254095" timestamp="1346272267"]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254029#msg1254029 date=1346266767]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1253916#msg1253916 date=1346257341]
[quote author=Dog Pound Nation link=topic=101997.msg1253667#msg1253667 date=1346207481]
Someone still sounds a bit bitter last year's "L".Maybe if the coach could coach, Humble would've had that HUMBLE ZONED TALENT. Don't worry. You only have to deal with us for two more years. Hope your program's turned around by then. By the way, don't like crow, but I will eat up some fried yard bird. Perferably Frenchy's. So have me a 10 piece with 2 peppers and a RED soda after we smash ya'll......................................please !!!!! ;)............................ and coming back on the 2nd string isn't really going toe to toe.ijs
[/quote]

you are a revisionist of history brother. 

Humble and SC were tied 14-7 at the half, SC lead.  No one scored the second quarter.  SC scored 14, Humble scored 7 in the third.  both scored 14 in the fourth.  Yall never held a wide enough lead for long enough to put in the second string team without risking a comeback.  QB Sharp played the entire game.  SC accounted for 600+ yards, and Humble had roughly 500+.    This was a very evenly matched game outside of redzone production.    Both defenses were terrible, and both offenses pretty much had their way with the defenses with the exception of humble executing inside the 20.    This game would of NEVER been 70-14 like another poster suggested.  SC was the better team, but not by much at all. and Humble was down right terrible last year.
[/quote]

Did you count how many time Screek took a knee? we took knee at 4yd line, we could have scored right before half but the QB messed up...we were on the 2yd line. and yes we did have 2nd string defense in...
[/quote]

You took the knee because you already up 7 points, and a turnover could mean 7 or 8 in the other direction.  Not worth the risk considering at that point the game was won. (good thing you don't coach). Theirs no need to take high risk, when victory is with in grasp.  And just because you say your 2nd string was in, doesn't change the fact that up until the last 4 downs.... your defense wasn't 2nd string.  that in itself would of been a stupid move, and if thats how your coaches coach...get ready to get reamed.
[/quote]

We lead by 20 plus points, we put our 2nd string in, and they pretty staed in bcuz we knew game was won, plus..we were headed to PLAYOFFS...keep making excuses...score just may be 70-14 this year ;)

[mikehoncho]

[quote name="SummerCreek it is!" post="1254207" timestamp="1346282787"]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1254095#msg1254095 date=1346272267]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254029#msg1254029 date=1346266767]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1253916#msg1253916 date=1346257341]
[quote author=Dog Pound Nation link=topic=101997.msg1253667#msg1253667 date=1346207481]
Someone still sounds a bit bitter last year's "L".Maybe if the coach could coach, Humble would've had that HUMBLE ZONED TALENT. Don't worry. You only have to deal with us for two more years. Hope your program's turned around by then. By the way, don't like crow, but I will eat up some fried yard bird. Perferably Frenchy's. So have me a 10 piece with 2 peppers and a RED soda after we smash ya'll......................................please !!!!! ;)............................ and coming back on the 2nd string isn't really going toe to toe.ijs
[/quote]

you are a revisionist of history brother. 

Humble and SC were tied 14-7 at the half, SC lead.  No one scored the second quarter.  SC scored 14, Humble scored 7 in the third.  both scored 14 in the fourth.  Yall never held a wide enough lead for long enough to put in the second string team without risking a comeback.  QB Sharp played the entire game.  SC accounted for 600+ yards, and Humble had roughly 500+.    This was a very evenly matched game outside of redzone production.    Both defenses were terrible, and both offenses pretty much had their way with the defenses with the exception of humble executing inside the 20.    This game would of NEVER been 70-14 like another poster suggested.  SC was the better team, but not by much at all. and Humble was down right terrible last year.
[/quote]

Did you count how many time Screek took a knee? we took knee at 4yd line, we could have scored right before half but the QB messed up...we were on the 2yd line. and yes we did have 2nd string defense in...
[/quote]

You took the knee because you already up 7 points, and a turnover could mean 7 or 8 in the other direction.  Not worth the risk considering at that point the game was won. (good thing you don't coach). Theirs no need to take high risk, when victory is with in grasp.  And just because you say your 2nd string was in, doesn't change the fact that up until the last 4 downs.... your defense wasn't 2nd string.  that in itself would of been a stupid move, and if thats how your coaches coach...get ready to get reamed.
[/quote]

We lead by 20 plus points, we put our 2nd string in, and they pretty staed in bcuz we knew game was won, plus..we were headed to PLAYOFFS...keep making excuses...score just may be 70-14 this year ;)
[/quote]

The sack on this one.....

You would think they're from Dayton or something  ;)

Seriously though, don't let the DC Tx Football preseason ratings go to your head...

[HUM398]

[quote name="SummerCreek it is!" post="1254207" timestamp="1346282787"]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1254095#msg1254095 date=1346272267]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254029#msg1254029 date=1346266767]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1253916#msg1253916 date=1346257341]
[quote author=Dog Pound Nation link=topic=101997.msg1253667#msg1253667 date=1346207481]
Someone still sounds a bit bitter last year's "L".Maybe if the coach could coach, Humble would've had that HUMBLE ZONED TALENT. Don't worry. You only have to deal with us for two more years. Hope your program's turned around by then. By the way, don't like crow, but I will eat up some fried yard bird. Perferably Frenchy's. So have me a 10 piece with 2 peppers and a RED soda after we smash ya'll......................................please !!!!! ;)............................ and coming back on the 2nd string isn't really going toe to toe.ijs
[/quote]

you are a revisionist of history brother. 

Humble and SC were tied 14-7 at the half, SC lead.  No one scored the second quarter.  SC scored 14, Humble scored 7 in the third.  both scored 14 in the fourth.  Yall never held a wide enough lead for long enough to put in the second string team without risking a comeback.  QB Sharp played the entire game.  SC accounted for 600+ yards, and Humble had roughly 500+.    This was a very evenly matched game outside of redzone production.    Both defenses were terrible, and both offenses pretty much had their way with the defenses with the exception of humble executing inside the 20.    This game would of NEVER been 70-14 like another poster suggested.  SC was the better team, but not by much at all. and Humble was down right terrible last year.
[/quote]

Did you count how many time Screek took a knee? we took knee at 4yd line, we could have scored right before half but the QB messed up...we were on the 2yd line. and yes we did have 2nd string defense in...
[/quote]

You took the knee because you already up 7 points, and a turnover could mean 7 or 8 in the other direction.  Not worth the risk considering at that point the game was won. (good thing you don't coach). Theirs no need to take high risk, when victory is with in grasp.  And just because you say your 2nd string was in, doesn't change the fact that up until the last 4 downs.... your defense wasn't 2nd string.  that in itself would of been a stupid move, and if thats how your coaches coach...get ready to get reamed.
[/quote]

We lead by 20 plus points, we put our 2nd string in, and they pretty staed in bcuz we knew game was won, plus..we were headed to PLAYOFFS...keep making excuses...score just may be 70-14 this year ;)
[/quote]

LOL!!!!

its going to be a lot of fun watching you suffer the taste of crow.    And i wouldn't count on us being a win.  We should give you a run for your money.  As it stand now, you are the better team.  Never underestimate the power of better coaching, and a fresh slate.

[dayton]

[quote name="SummerCreek it is!" post="1254207" timestamp="1346282787"]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1254095#msg1254095 date=1346272267]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254029#msg1254029 date=1346266767]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1253916#msg1253916 date=1346257341]
[quote author=Dog Pound Nation link=topic=101997.msg1253667#msg1253667 date=1346207481]
Someone still sounds a bit bitter last year's "L".Maybe if the coach could coach, Humble would've had that HUMBLE ZONED TALENT. Don't worry. You only have to deal with us for two more years. Hope your program's turned around by then. By the way, don't like crow, but I will eat up some fried yard bird. Perferably Frenchy's. So have me a 10 piece with 2 peppers and a RED soda after we smash ya'll......................................please !!!!! ;)............................ and coming back on the 2nd string isn't really going toe to toe.ijs
[/quote]

you are a revisionist of history brother. 

Humble and SC were tied 14-7 at the half, SC lead.  No one scored the second quarter.  SC scored 14, Humble scored 7 in the third.  both scored 14 in the fourth.  Yall never held a wide enough lead for long enough to put in the second string team without risking a comeback.  QB Sharp played the entire game.  SC accounted for 600+ yards, and Humble had roughly 500+.    This was a very evenly matched game outside of redzone production.    Both defenses were terrible, and both offenses pretty much had their way with the defenses with the exception of humble executing inside the 20.    This game would of NEVER been 70-14 like another poster suggested.  SC was the better team, but not by much at all. and Humble was down right terrible last year.
[/quote]

Did you count how many time Screek took a knee? we took knee at 4yd line, we could have scored right before half but the QB messed up...we were on the 2yd line. and yes we did have 2nd string defense in...
[/quote]

You took the knee because you already up 7 points, and a turnover could mean 7 or 8 in the other direction.  Not worth the risk considering at that point the game was won. (good thing you don't coach). Theirs no need to take high risk, when victory is with in grasp.  And just because you say your 2nd string was in, doesn't change the fact that up until the last 4 downs.... your defense wasn't 2nd string.  that in itself would of been a stupid move, and if thats how your coaches coach...get ready to get reamed.
[/quote]

[b]We lead by 20 plus points, we put our 2nd string in, and they pretty staed in bcuz we knew game was won, plus..we were headed to PLAYOFFS...keep making excuses...score just may be 70-14 this year ;)[/b][/quote]

looking at the box score... Humble scored 2 touchdowns in less than 3 min on that 2nd string defense.... that put them within 7 with over 3 min to play. SC just about shot themselves in the foot putting that 2nd D in!!!

[Guest octfeb]

Well boys and girls it's a new season.. new district.... you can go back and forth about last season.. but it's what happens THIS season is what counts... JS  :)

[bh89-2]

[quote name="octfeb" post="1254493" timestamp="1346325481"]
Well boys and girls it's a new season.. new district.... you can go back and forth about last season.. but it's what happens THIS season is what counts... JS  :)
[/quote]

Considering the beating Bh put on Dayton 12 months ago, I'd want to forget it too.  What was that score again.....70-14 or something like that?  ;D ;D ;D

[Guest octfeb]

[quote name="Smoking Baby" post="1254536" timestamp="1346330046"]
[quote author=octfeb link=topic=101997.msg1254493#msg1254493 date=1346325481]
Well boys and girls it's a new season.. new district.... you can go back and forth about last season.. but it's what happens THIS season is what counts... JS  :)
[/quote]

Considering the beating Bh put on Dayton 12 months ago, I'd want to forget it too.  What was that score again.....70-14 or something like that?  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote] sure.... if you think the score last season was a beating... 54-0 is a beating.... but this is a SC and GP thread...

[SummerCreek it is!]

[quote name="HUM398" post="1254449" timestamp="1346301365"]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254207#msg1254207 date=1346282787]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1254095#msg1254095 date=1346272267]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254029#msg1254029 date=1346266767]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1253916#msg1253916 date=1346257341]
[quote author=Dog Pound Nation link=topic=101997.msg1253667#msg1253667 date=1346207481]
Someone still sounds a bit bitter last year's "L".Maybe if the coach could coach, Humble would've had that HUMBLE ZONED TALENT. Don't worry. You only have to deal with us for two more years. Hope your program's turned around by then. By the way, don't like crow, but I will eat up some fried yard bird. Perferably Frenchy's. So have me a 10 piece with 2 peppers and a RED soda after we smash ya'll......................................please !!!!! ;)............................ and coming back on the 2nd string isn't really going toe to toe.ijs
[/quote]

you are a revisionist of history brother. 

Humble and SC were tied 14-7 at the half, SC lead.  No one scored the second quarter.  SC scored 14, Humble scored 7 in the third.  both scored 14 in the fourth.  Yall never held a wide enough lead for long enough to put in the second string team without risking a comeback.  QB Sharp played the entire game.  SC accounted for 600+ yards, and Humble had roughly 500+.    This was a very evenly matched game outside of redzone production.    Both defenses were terrible, and both offenses pretty much had their way with the defenses with the exception of humble executing inside the 20.    This game would of NEVER been 70-14 like another poster suggested.  SC was the better team, but not by much at all. and Humble was down right terrible last year.
[/quote]

Did you count how many time Screek took a knee? we took knee at 4yd line, we could have scored right before half but the QB messed up...we were on the 2yd line. and yes we did have 2nd string defense in...
[/quote]

You took the knee because you already up 7 points, and a turnover could mean 7 or 8 in the other direction.  Not worth the risk considering at that point the game was won. (good thing you don't coach). Theirs no need to take high risk, when victory is with in grasp.  And just because you say your 2nd string was in, doesn't change the fact that up until the last 4 downs.... your defense wasn't 2nd string.  that in itself would of been a stupid move, and if thats how your coaches coach...get ready to get reamed.
[/quote]

We lead by 20 plus points, we put our 2nd string in, and they pretty staed in bcuz we knew game was won, plus..we were headed to PLAYOFFS...keep making excuses...score just may be 70-14 this year ;)
[/quote]

LOL!!!!

its going to be a lot of fun watching you suffer the taste of crow.    And i wouldn't count on us being a win.  We should give you a run for your money.  As it stand now, you are the better team.  Never underestimate the power of better coaching, and a fresh slate.
[/quote]

You keep saying we gonna taste crow, don't get off subject of Screek vs Humble...If we lose to anybody in district, I rather it be dayton because they are a good team nd some pick them to beat us, so really we have nothing to lose, but hear it on here from the dayton people,,,,Humble and Caney Creek tied 6-6 in a scrimmage ;D ;D ;D....you need to keep your focus on YOUR KITTIES

[SummerCreek it is!]

[quote name="dayton" post="1254482" timestamp="1346322447"]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254207#msg1254207 date=1346282787]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1254095#msg1254095 date=1346272267]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254029#msg1254029 date=1346266767]
[quote author=HUM398 link=topic=101997.msg1253916#msg1253916 date=1346257341]
[quote author=Dog Pound Nation link=topic=101997.msg1253667#msg1253667 date=1346207481]
Someone still sounds a bit bitter last year's "L".Maybe if the coach could coach, Humble would've had that HUMBLE ZONED TALENT. Don't worry. You only have to deal with us for two more years. Hope your program's turned around by then. By the way, don't like crow, but I will eat up some fried yard bird. Perferably Frenchy's. So have me a 10 piece with 2 peppers and a RED soda after we smash ya'll......................................please !!!!! ;)............................ and coming back on the 2nd string isn't really going toe to toe.ijs
[/quote]

you are a revisionist of history brother. 

Humble and SC were tied 14-7 at the half, SC lead.  No one scored the second quarter.  SC scored 14, Humble scored 7 in the third.  both scored 14 in the fourth.  Yall never held a wide enough lead for long enough to put in the second string team without risking a comeback.  QB Sharp played the entire game.  SC accounted for 600+ yards, and Humble had roughly 500+.    This was a very evenly matched game outside of redzone production.    Both defenses were terrible, and both offenses pretty much had their way with the defenses with the exception of humble executing inside the 20.    This game would of NEVER been 70-14 like another poster suggested.  SC was the better team, but not by much at all. and Humble was down right terrible last year.
[/quote]

Did you count how many time Screek took a knee? we took knee at 4yd line, we could have scored right before half but the QB messed up...we were on the 2yd line. and yes we did have 2nd string defense in...
[/quote]

You took the knee because you already up 7 points, and a turnover could mean 7 or 8 in the other direction.  Not worth the risk considering at that point the game was won. (good thing you don't coach). Theirs no need to take high risk, when victory is with in grasp.  And just because you say your 2nd string was in, doesn't change the fact that up until the last 4 downs.... your defense wasn't 2nd string.  that in itself would of been a stupid move, and if thats how your coaches coach...get ready to get reamed.
[/quote]

[b]We lead by 20 plus points, we put our 2nd string in, and they pretty staed in bcuz we knew game was won, plus..we were headed to PLAYOFFS...keep making excuses...score just may be 70-14 this year ;)[/b][/quote]

looking at the box score... Humble scored 2 touchdowns in less than 3 min on that 2nd string defense.... that put them within 7 with over 3 min to play. SC just about shot themselves in the foot putting that 2nd D in!!!
[/quote]

Exactly, the 2 TDs in 3 min tells you the 2nd Defense was in...and yea we shouldn't have had 2nd string in, but we knew we were going to Playoffs and Humble WAS'NT ;D ;D so I guess they decided to put them in....i mean we can't control the coaching lol

[HUM398]

[quote name="SummerCreek it is!" post="1254697" timestamp="1346344800"]

You keep saying we gonna taste crow, don't get off subject of Screek vs Humble...If we lose to anybody in district, I rather it be dayton because they are a good team nd some pick them to beat us, so really we have nothing to lose, but hear it on here from the dayton people,,,,Humble and Caney Creek tied 6-6 in a scrimmage ;D ;D ;D....you need to keep your focus on YOUR KITTIES
[/quote]

Scrimmage scores are not indictive to how well a team will do.  Humble use to whoop up on Lufkin every year they scrimmaged them in the late 90's early 00's.  I can guarntee you that most of those Lufkin teams we scrimmaged would of beat us by a good 14 points.

Scrimmages are as much about coaching as they are about players.  You try different things, and different pieces.  They are meant to fine tune, not come out victorious.  Thats why when i watch a scrimmage i watch coaching tendencies and technique more then i pay attention to plays.  how frequently do they blitz, do the coaches prefer man or zone, on offense how are the WR running routes.  Things of that nature.  I can't gauge the overall success of a team based on a fake game with no ramifications whos purpose is soley to perfect or fix broken tendencies.

Make no mistake, Humble has a LOT to work on before district starts.  alot of these guys are going to be playing varsity for the very first time, and their is always learning curve.  Question for them is how fast can they learn?  Humble is athletic enough to play with anyone in the district, but is not experianced enough from what i have observed to win close games.  How well they do will depend on how mentally prepared these guys are. 

[SummerCreek it is!]

[quote name="HUM398" post="1254828" timestamp="1346354152"]
[quote author=SummerCreek it is! link=topic=101997.msg1254697#msg1254697 date=1346344800]

You keep saying we gonna taste crow, don't get off subject of Screek vs Humble...If we lose to anybody in district, I rather it be dayton because they are a good team nd some pick them to beat us, so really we have nothing to lose, but hear it on here from the dayton people,,,,Humble and Caney Creek tied 6-6 in a scrimmage ;D ;D ;D....you need to keep your focus on YOUR KITTIES
[/quote]

Scrimmage scores are not indictive to how well a team will do.  Humble use to whoop up on Lufkin every year they scrimmaged them in the late 90's early 00's.  I can guarntee you that most of those Lufkin teams we scrimmaged would of beat us by a good 14 points.

Scrimmages are as much about coaching as they are about players.  You try different things, and different pieces.  They are meant to fine tune, not come out victorious.  Thats why when i watch a scrimmage i watch coaching tendencies and technique more then i pay attention to plays.  how frequently do they blitz, do the coaches prefer man or zone, on offense how are the WR running routes.  Things of that nature.  I can't gauge the overall success of a team based on a fake game with no ramifications whos purpose is soley to perfect or fix broken tendencies.

Make no mistake, Humble has a LOT to work on before district starts.  alot of these guys are going to be playing varsity for the very first time, and their is always learning curve.  Question for them is how fast can they learn?  Humble is athletic enough to play with anyone in the district, but is not experianced enough from what i have observed to win close games.  How well they do will depend on how mentally prepared these guys are.
[/quote]


Well looking at last nights game, you should worry more about your CATS then worrying about Screek...you jump on here talking about the Screek team eating crow and don't derserve respect, nooone said a word about Humble until you come with your two cents....and I really don't care WHO don't like it  8)