AggiesAreWe Posted February 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 Score by quarters 1 2 3 4 totHamshire-Fannett 6 20 16 16 58Silsbee 33 19 29 20 101FT %HF 5/11 45%SIL 8/13 62%3 Point %HF 3/13 23%SIL 7/15 47%ReboundsHF 29SIL 42TurnoversHF 29SIL 19FoulsHF 14SIL 18Individual scoringHFDarius Riley 18Kaleb Havard 12Ryan Johnson 6Travis Appling 6Brock Thewman 5Kendrick King 4Jordan Brown 4Steven Hubert 3SilsbeeChris Elam 26Jordan Holmes 22 (5/8 three's)Davaughn Thomas 17 (12 rebounds)Danti Wilson 12Patrick Reed 10 (12 rebounds)Ladavian Barnes 6Jake Dobbins 4Nathaniel Scott 2Zayon Jackson 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 [quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1370446" timestamp="1360123399"][quote author=BADSANTA link=topic=108988.msg1370398#msg1370398 date=1360120001]There defense sounded suffocating! KSalumni400 u know good a be well I wasn't at the game. I bet they looked better than Kountze will be Yates![/quote]Wow!! BS is comparing Hamshire-Fannett and Yates. smh ::)[/quote] ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADSANTA Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 Really Aggie? Did I compare HF and Yates? Reread the statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted February 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 [quote name="BADSANTA" post="1370526" timestamp="1360153716"]Really Aggie? Did I compare HF and Yates? Reread the statement[/quote]You stated that Silsbee looked better against HF than what Kountze will look against Yates. That's comparing HF and Yates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts