baddog

Don’t show this to big girl/boy. It would confuse her/him. I would love for Jim Jordan to run for president in 2024.

Starting out your rebuttal with “I heard”, you could be a witness for the impeachment inquiry. Hey, if Hunter was there in good faith, might as well take some dirty money, huh? We have already shown you numerous times what Joe said.

[Hidden Content] LMAO!!!!!!!!

I like this guy.

I’ll add to this: If the whistleblower for the impeachment hearing turned up dead, I would immediately, if not sooner, suspect Trump, or at least someone in his clique. Why do you not have that ability with Hillary?

In America, doesn’t the defendant have the “right” to face his accusers (whistleblower)? Is it because formal charges have not been filed? Is it because this is nothing more than a political circus? I mean Schiff with a gavel in hand is a scary sight. All the Dems want is their mug on TV. That way they are somebody. Probably not even king of their castle.

You know, there was a time that I thought you may have a head on your shoulders, but you can’t tell right from wrong...... how sad.

Pretty easy to accomplish when you own the DOJ and FBI plus the Clinton strong arm team making sure no corruption charges (whistleblowers) ever make it to court alive.

That link I posted shows Biden calling the man an SOB and admitting the quid pro quo. To me, the source doesn’t matter if you have video. Again, how was this for the betterment of the US?

I guess this clip would not be shown on cnn. [Hidden Content]

Hunter Biden’s company was being investigated for corruption. Daddy Biden called and told them he was withholding $ billions unless they fired the investigator. Daddy Biden even admitted he did just that. Was that for US foreign policy or Daddy protecting his crooked son? How does anyone get that confused?

All we heard from you and your cronies during the Obama years, was how V.P. Dick Cheney had shady dealings with his Halliburton connection. You are a two-faced demoncrat. Some may think an idoit.

It’s a reflex reaction. I used to like A&M during the Slocum years, up until he fired all of his coaches. Never understood that. The the ags on this board could make you hate anything. I still don’t hate, just pick.

Yeah, like the “they’re back” comment and the fact that igs are always on the Texas thread, especially if we lose. Funny how a non conference team gets so much attention from igs. I knew SC wasn’t good, but you continue with your condescension as if I wasn’t aware. You act as though my ig comment of “ let’s see how they do” was terrible of me, when that’s what you hope for weekly for my Horns. How anyone can despise a University as much as igs do Texas is totally unbelievable to me. I can’t shoulder that much hate in my life.

Even the weaker conferences get ranked sometimes. So with your reasoning, the Igs can beat Georgia. That’s like me saying Texas is as good as Bama because we played lsu to almost identical scores. I think we both know better.

The others were Charleston Southern, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt. One of their losses was to Appalachian State. Good solid victory. Lol

Igs played well against 4-6, now 4-7 SC. Cant believe they won 4. Still, an SEC victory counts for more than outside conference games. Not sure if Herman is to blame 100%. The coordinators actually control the game. Herman is responsible for having his team prepared and fired up. We looked flat all day. I blame that on him. Another ho-hum season but we will go bowling. Nothing to really brag about that.

For those who may have missed it....

This win should be shouted from the rooftops. Lol

Texas played bad and still could have won this. Iowa State could whip a lot of the hater’s teams, except for team first. They lost a lot of very close games and finally won one. Like TXhorn said, just get the first down at the end and get the W. Let’s see how well the gloating igs do against SC

They are on to Shifty Shiff....

Great comeback......typical

Not difficult to defeat someone who, instead of being consistent in their judgements, flaunts a biased opinion.

Of course, all of the above. If the “what about” questions seem impertinent to you, then you are not consistent in your judgements. Therefore, you have no argument.

Wrong. ^^^ This is the type of response from one who has no argument. Didn’t answer one question. Typical.