Englebert

There's those wild assertions again. What question did you answer? You've attempted an answer for some, ran from others. Do you even know what a circular argument is? Do bother with an attempt to answer, it is perfectly clear to the point of being rhetorical. That was not my article. I posted the first link I could find from a source that was not considered Right wing. I didn't even read it, as I have already read the story from previous listed sources. And where did you say/allude I was using your argument strategy? I missed that point. I'm assuming your strategy is to post off-topic, senseless, and baseless statements in order to deflect, which is a far cry from what I'm doing. I also missed where you answered the question of backing up your claims that the attorney general, or anyone in the Trump administration is repealing Civil Rights legislation. You claim to have answered, but have you? Please point to that tidbit of information. I'm curious as to why you're "not going there"? You seem to have hinted that you think some of my points are steeped in racism. If you want to hint at something, why not just come out and say it when directly challenged? Is the reason you won't "go there" because you know I will immediately ask you to backup your claims, and you know you can't? Do you think I have a right to question when a person levies racist accusations, especially at myself? And if I do question the veracity of those claims, should I expect the accuser to get "worked up" for me having the audacity to question a serious charge?

What makes you think I'm "working myself up". Big Girl claimed that illegals can't vote as a response to a post. I posted the links, and basically said the same thing you did...that's it's a slippery slope. You jumped into the topic, then are trying to claim I'm worked up. Are you worked up? After all, we basically said the same thing, but since I don't follow the Liberal indoctrination, does that mean I get judged on a different paradigm? Please layout your rationale for your proclamation that the attorney general is dismantling Civil Rights. What actions have been taken, or even words spoken, that lead you to believe Civil Rights legislation is in jeopardy of being repealed, or that other legislation is being considered to counteract current law? Can you backup your claims? I have I feeling I know where this will go. Will you try the deflection ploy, the personal attack ploy, the victim ploy, or will you actually engage in a debate of your claims. And just for curiosity, do you think I'm racist?

You are comical, I will give you that. The ol' "I ain't got time for that" routine is a bit overplayed by now don't you think? I challenge you to pick one of your links, even though it was not part of the initial discussion, for further analysis. Run, Forest, run. California is giving aliens the right to vote. Just like a Liberal, I guess you refuse to acknowledge news that doesn't fit your agenda. Here you go: [Hidden Content] There are more links above that I'm sure you didn't read. San Francisco is allowing illegals to vote in local school board elections. Do you dispute this? Will you post a link from Politifact that says no illegals voted in the 2016 election as proof that this link is false. We already had one try this, let's see if we get two. And how many GOP politicians were exposed as racist this week? According to you, we should have had at least one. I know the answer...all of them. And what is that legislation that the GOP is putting together that will roll back Civil Rights? Have they given it a name yet? Will it be a cute name to disguise the sinister objective like the "Affordable Care Act"?

And I told you to pick one for further discussion. You ran like a frightened schoolgirl. The laughter is just booming all around you. Your sources were answers to questions not asked, and did nothing to further your wild exclamations. Your seemingly insistence that you somehow "proved" some point is just comical, then refusing to discuss your links made it just hysterical. How to you feel about Big Girl posting a link from Politifact about voting fraud from the 2016 election, when the topic was about California giving local voting rights to illegals? Sound familiar? Is this some sort of Liberal strategy to run from outlandish statements?

Man are you confused. I gave her information from multiple sources, and she still questioned the sources. You might want to get a better comprehension of the subject matter before commenting. And it is long standing practice that when you make an allegation, the burden is on you to back up your statements. It is abundantly clear that the Liberals have no clue of this concept. You might want to re-read that pedophile example, let it sink in, and then comment on backing up statements.

When have stats ever mattered to a Liberal? The better theory is that it's overwhelmingly plausible he doesn't know what that word means to use it in such an inappropriate fashion. The laughter continues, but empathy and sadness is gaining ground.

Run, little one, run...just like you've done in the past. If you feel up to backing up your claims, bring your best. But we all know you will run just like in the past. So what will the topic be for debate? Please pick one, preferably from BearEssentials97 post of links, for further discussion (since he ran like a frightened schoolgirl). You know, the ones you had the audacity to say I was schooled on. Oh wait...run, little one, run, just like you've done in the recent past. That laughter is thunderous ain't it. And please, please, oh please, point out the talking points I've thrown out from any news source. If you had two functioning brain cells, you would realize that when dealing with the likes of "you people" (just for you Dove), I provide a platform for you yourselves to dig your hole. So please, elaborate on your childish stereotypes. Although I would longingly anticipate a debate, I bet you won't...past history has proven this.

I think we found Bagdad Bob. I was wondering where that guy ran off to.

"Without including all of the factors". Hummmmm. If only more people would just heed this little nugget, instead of the ol' "I don't need no stinking evidence". If his analogy was a thrown basketball you would be in the hospital for a broken nose. The laughter continues.

We've had the privilege of witnessing your "expert" analysis on previous occasions, and we are still laughing. I can't believe you have the nerve to show up on here again after all of the "beatdowns" you have taken. Oh well, I'll never understand masochism.

Always trying to deflect. You said lawmakers were being exposed on a weekly basis as being racist. You will not prove that, you cannot prove that. Your links in no way shape or form prove any lawmakers being outed as racist as you claim, just a way for you to deflect. Your personal attacks are very comical, considering you are exhibiting your exact words to a tee. We can all see it, but for some reason "you are choosing to be stupid" or just...well, there is no "other". "Nothing else to discuss" should imply that something was previously discussed, but since you are too coward to do that, I guess you will just run.

Such condescension from an obviously stunted and challenged mentality. Priceless. That hole keeps getting deeper while the laughter (turning to empathy) continues. Run, run, run. Evidence: you said you answered my questions about the GOP. You said lawmakers were being outed as racist on a weekly basis. I asked you to name them, or name just one. You ran like a frightened schoolgirl. And then you have the nerve to falsely claim you answered...with the all too familiar air of Liberal superiority. Do you actually believe we can't see your disingenuous and childish actions. Your claim of answering some of my other questions was to post a plethora of links with no critique on your part. I asked you to pick one for discussion and you flatly refused. I'm guessing fear played a big part in that. I never asked you about the war on the drugs but somehow in your convoluted mixed up brain due to Liberal following you must have employed the typical stereotype ideology to claim I did. Thank God it's not your job to educate me...or anyone.

Delusional much? Don't worry, your ploy for the sympathy card is gaining traction. I'm really starting to feel sorry for you.

Again, for about the fifteenth time, choose one of your "facts" for debate, or forever endure that cluck, cluck, cluck going off in your head. I'm astonished you keep digger deeper in that hole of embarrassment you dug for yourself. Your obvious and childish attempts at deflection are just sad and simultaneously comical.

If it does pan out I'm sure we will hear the ol' "but Obama laid the groundwork" rhetoric just like we heard about the economy.

This is just hilarious. You try to denigrate me, accuse me of being a racist, accuse me of having no comprehension skills, call me an idiot, etc. for the mere audacity of challenging your wild assertions. All I have done in this whole "debate" (LOL) is to give you a pathway for your true colors to emerge...which was not much of a challenge. How are you not embarrassed? Maybe you will go back and read this thread, but I have a feeling you will just harbor the hate for someone who merely asks you to explain your own statements. I will take credit for laying the seeds that enticed you to spread your peacock feathers through reprehensible debating tactics, but I only followed in kind. Let me know when you discover the cojones to actually debate your articles. I have no doubt that conversation will be as entertaining as this one.

Please elaborate on my analysis of the subject. I've given none, only dared you to prove your childish and immature though processes, which you run from. Does the phrase "cluck, cluck, cluck" come to mind. So again, please pick one of the articles you linked for further discussion. Your immature and condescending attitude will again not get you out of this. It just proves without a shadow of a doubt you mindlessly parrot others with no comprehension of the words written. Is there any doubt that analysis is not crystal clear to anyone with two functioning brain cells. My question now is "how can you not see how much of a fool you have made yourself into?" So pick one of your peer reviewed articles. If your research is beyond reproach, you should have no problem backing it up. Ooops, I think you are hearing the "cluck, cluck, cluck" again. You are venturing...scratch that, you are all over Big Girl territory now. The scary part is that you can't even comprehend the depths of lies you have perpetuated in this one conversation. So again, pick an article for discussion. After all, these articles are your "facts". Man I can't stop laughing.

Why are you running again? Pick a link you posted for analysis. You can deflect, but that will just cause the laughter to get louder. You answered no questions, and your asinine assertions will not get you out of this. And I can guarantee you are not having as much fun as me. So again, pick your topic for discussion, or be haunted with the "cluck, cluck, cluck" reverberating through your head.

And still, through all of your deflection attempts, no answer to the question of GOP politicians exposing themselves as racist on a weekly basis. Since you are insistent on not owing me an explanation or proof to your wild allegations, I will play the same card. You are a pedophile. The only question is what gender and age do you prefer. We all know it. History has shown it. Your ramblings prove it without a doubt. So what age and gender do you prefer...teen or preteen. Male or female. Admit it. Come clean and admit you are a sick pedophile. How does it feel to have hateful allegations levied against you, then decry no proof necessary. Let that sink in before you reply.

So I challenge you to discuss/debate an article you attempted to use as backup to your claim, and you run like a little chicken. I'll give you one thing, you beat me to the cluck, cluck, cluck. But I'm not going to let you off that easy. I will challenge you again. Pick a link you posted for deeper analysis. You can run, but I will keep reminding you of the cluck, cluck, cluck comment you preemptively used on yourself. Your personal attacks as a deflection probably worked in the past, but I've grown accustomed to (and adopted) that strategy, but will also stay on topic. So again, pick your best link from the myriad of propaganda that only a childish, immature, and mentally stunted person could consider as post-worthy, and let's discuss. I promise that the outcome could not possibly embarrass you more than you have already embarrassed yourself, but there is a strong possibility I could be wrong.

I'm going to quote this one, but it pertains to your previous quote also...which frankly is hilarious. So you think 100% of White people are racist (your numbers stated above). These people control the laws through sheer numbers, but Civil Rights legislation still exists. Are your really this dense? Seriously, are you really this dense? At least you tried. The entertainment value skyrocketed when you tried to employ the condescending tactic. This normally only works when you have the facts. Considering you don't, the laughter meter (at you) just flies off the rails. I have no problem discussing any one of your above topics. Please pick one for deeper analysis. TDS is written all over them, and facts will not be your friend. So please indulge me with your best selection. We can go through them one by one. Where do we start? Your choice.

Wow, why would I not want to acknowledge anything? I want you to give examples of the lawmakers being exposed on a weekly basis of being racist. You claim my comprehension is bad, which is such irony when I called you out explicitly to backup your statements. You seem to somehow and mysteriously (just joking...there is no mystery here) failed to comprehend a direct challenge. That is Comprehension 101. So please, once again, back up your statements. Run and hide from the questions all you want, and I will just remind you of your own attempts of deflection. Since you laughable tried to obfuscate the pertinent questions with worn out rabble, I challenge you to somehow tie the war on drugs to Trump and/or the GOP. I challenge you to give supporting evidence of mandatory sentencing as racism. These are very, very pathetic attempts to deflect (run) from a direct challenge. Let me add to the questions you will run from, although this should be an easy one for you. What percentage of White people do you consider racist?

You would think that considering "every week a racist lawmaker is being exposed" (a BearEssentials97 quote), my above question would be a simple Bing search. I'm baffled by the non-response by him. He seemed so sure of himself and very, very adamant about this issue. As a professor once told me, "It's simple to make a statement...it is a whole other world to backup that statement." Based on the long, long history of refusal of other race baiters to provide evidence, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting on a response...even though I hope one is imminent. He also said that Jeff Sessions and the GOP are in the works for repealing Civil Rights legislation. Has anybody else heard this? Maybe it's decreed in those secret history books I've heard so much about. The topper for this issue is that he made this statement, then cried Trump was playing up irrational fears. The irony smacks you in the face like a pot, or kettle...take your pick. Please, oh, please BearEssentials97, would you care to respond? Most childish race baiters have shown they will just slink back into the bushes when challenged, only to emerge at a later time with the same worn out rhetoric. Here's your chance to actually stand up and defend your views. Somehow I feel the victim card will now be played.

Thanks.

I think HF is playing Hughes Springs in Center in pre-district...Aug 31. That's what the schedule on Maxpreps is showing. Hopefully I'll get confirmation shortly. If anyone knows for sure, please post.