You have established you own “quantifiable best in the world at something” criteria. By your beliefs, women aren’t as qualified as men, so should the SCOTUS be made up of all men, no women?
In fairness, the same news network has reported on PA and Beaumont low scores too. They reported on the higher scoring districts as well.
I’m alway rooting for WOS but the low score trends year after year needs to improve.
That depends on who's criteria you are using to quantify. Yours I suppose. Your lying to yourself to think males are superior in every area. Using your criteria, there should be no women in the supreme court.
Low report card performance on the district and yet 38 pages on this thread and public speakers at the last board meeting complaining about the HC pick. Hum. 🙄
I have no problem with him be committed to nominating a black woman. In fact, I appreciate him saying it up front rather than going through the smoke screen motions and claiming his nominee is the best possible candidate BS. I believe diversity should be considered when making up the supreme court.
After a year in office, I finally agree with one thing he's done.
I read an interview with Toby when he left Central. He said his new gig was paying him six figures. What makes Toby supporters think WOS could or should afford to bring him in? Should he make more than CT?