thetragichippy

“To be clear, the President and his family will not receive any royalty, licensing fee, or financial consideration whatsoever from the proposed [Palm Beach] airport renaming,” Kimberly Benza, director of executive operations and communications at the Trump Organization, said in an email to Forbes, adding the President “is, and always has been, willing to provide this right to his hometown county at no charge.” we will see

Proof of what? That Colbert is a liar? “We were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert told his viewers Monday night. CBS told a different story in a statement Tuesday afternoon: The network said “The Late Show” was given “legal guidance” but was not “prohibited” from broadcasting the interview. The Federal Communications Commission, which regulates local stations owned by broadcasters like CBS, recently issued new guidance about an old regulation known as the “equal time” rule. The rules do not apply to cable or streaming — which is why Colbert’s show posted the Talarico interview on YouTube as an “online-only exclusive” — but do apply to local TV and radio stations. [Hidden Content]

I don't see anyone beating that ticket. Kamala won't run, Hillary is 78, she'll be 80 in 2028, so she's done, Michelle Obama would concern me, but I doubt she would run and take the chance of losing.... Democrats are in a world of hurt at the moment

Trump has done well on the 80/20 issues - If Democrats want to be competitive they need to get away from abolish ICE and any gender related issues. Also, if They take control of house and/or senate and try the impeachment road, that will be a positive for Vance and Rubio.

That Yale Hillbilly added significant votes to the Trump ticket. Little Marco is doing a great job in foreign affairs, and is a good speaker. I hope the rest of the Democratic party takes him as light as you do. And just a reminder - Kamala ran (and lost bigly) and was a basic failure as a VP.....

I agree with you, not a hoax at all. I personally don't think the Biden admin/DOJ would have let it go if their was evidence.....and I'm not a Biden Admin fan at all

wait, tell me not the same victims that wore t-shirts in front of Congress in the public....right?

I may be wrong, but I believe she was complying with the law congress wrote.

How do you justify every previous administration not charging anyone with all that video footage?

You seem reasonable. Victims have list - Leak it to Media - they wont Massie named 6 people from the "list(that does not exist) - Two, Leslie Wexner - Epstein managed his money and Sultan Sulayem - had email contact and business dealings - All known during Biden administration - No charges or any allegations of criminal activity. The other 4 had nothing to do with Epstein..... Whoopi is in there too.....and we KNOW she's too......never mind..., lol So I'm not buying this distraction......like my Father used to say - Either poop or get off the pot.....

I know it is early, but they seem to be respecting the pecking order, and working great together. They are both excellent communicators and debaters. Who in the Democratic party would give them a challenge? Will the Democrats run another woman?

THERE IS NO LIST!!! THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A LIST.

You get em....lol

How ? - there are several law suits currently in progress challenging the cuts he did make. If he made more, it would get even worse. Congress won't do it because Republicans don't have enough votes with Republicans in left leaning districts.

As of early 2026, the Trump administration has significantly reduced the federal workforce, with reports indicating a decline of approximately 220,000 to over 300,000 federal positions since the start of his second term There’s some of your cut spending, how many presidents have talked about shrinking the government, and look here but of course….no credit given

Imagine that…… Wonder what it would take politically to get them unsealed……🤔

Lol - impeached 😂😂 How did that work last time?

Lol - who you think is paying to challenge Trump in all those supreme court cases he has one….you worried so much about your tax dollars, you and your Democratic friends should stop challenging Trump every time he sneezes 🤦🏻‍♂️

Stock market in general has been great in spite of Trumps tariffs, trade deals and mass deportation.

Nails it

Throwing out names from random emails is easy.....but did they do anything? Just because they are mentioned does not equate guilt.....but is sure creates clicks for folks that get monetized for activity on social media. We are up to 59 pages here talking about it. Look at Kathryn Ruemmler - She had to resign because she was friends with him - was Obama's white house counsel from 2011 - 2014 - No accusations of any criminal activity.

THIS RIGHT HERE!

I like the no excuses attitude, but there are obstacles that take time.

If only it was that easy..... Took me a month to hire my last employee. I needed a replacement for my last one who was promoted. I have a good record for hiring good people, and that can take some time with the current talent pool......

We live in a time of instant gratification. What once took days to get information now takes seconds. With that said…. This administration has just passed the 1 year mark. Democrats have wisely tied up over 500 DOJ lawyers to redact the Epstein documents. What could 500 attorneys be doing instead of redacting files? Based on what I have seen Trump do, Trump does not back down. I’m still optimistic Trump has the right people in place to go after criminals. It takes time to put together a case against someone, and rushing could screw up the case. He is also dealing with “never Trumpers” buried deep in the DOJ and FBI. So with all that, I’m cautiously optimistic.