thetragichippy

Lol - who you think is paying to challenge Trump in all those supreme court cases he has one….you worried so much about your tax dollars, you and your Democratic friends should stop challenging Trump every time he sneezes 🤦🏻‍♂️

Stock market in general has been great in spite of Trumps tariffs, trade deals and mass deportation.

Nails it

Throwing out names from random emails is easy.....but did they do anything? Just because they are mentioned does not equate guilt.....but is sure creates clicks for folks that get monetized for activity on social media. We are up to 59 pages here talking about it. Look at Kathryn Ruemmler - She had to resign because she was friends with him - was Obama's white house counsel from 2011 - 2014 - No accusations of any criminal activity.

THIS RIGHT HERE!

I like the no excuses attitude, but there are obstacles that take time.

If only it was that easy..... Took me a month to hire my last employee. I needed a replacement for my last one who was promoted. I have a good record for hiring good people, and that can take some time with the current talent pool......

We live in a time of instant gratification. What once took days to get information now takes seconds. With that said…. This administration has just passed the 1 year mark. Democrats have wisely tied up over 500 DOJ lawyers to redact the Epstein documents. What could 500 attorneys be doing instead of redacting files? Based on what I have seen Trump do, Trump does not back down. I’m still optimistic Trump has the right people in place to go after criminals. It takes time to put together a case against someone, and rushing could screw up the case. He is also dealing with “never Trumpers” buried deep in the DOJ and FBI. So with all that, I’m cautiously optimistic.

Real talk: If the Epstein hysteria was to evaporate tomorrow never to be heard about again, by far the biggest losses will be the revenue now being realized by all the online influencers who are relying on it for income.

Instead of wearing T-shirts, just say the names

Over 3 million released…..again, victims could clear this all up

See, that’s the problem. You can’t name 5….evidence is an inconvenience when you want something to be true.

You seem to be in the know….

10 names, heck, I’ll take 5…

@DCT - Give 10 names…..

So could the victims….. BUT, most took settlements for their silence….cold hard truth. I’m all for getting pedo’s but you need evidence and these “victims” may not be good witnesses.

Listening and understanding is almost as important as common sense…… They could release the names……

Dude, no it does not, it actually reenforces it….why do the victims need ANYONE to release the names? So because the DOJ won’t meet with them they can’t release the names😂😂. Please….. ANY news outlet will welcome with open arms the victims if they released the names.

Interesting how law and proof work….

Or a Judge who will be one sided and go against norms to get a conviction….as in Trumps case

First you didn’t address my point, you went straight to emotion. Second, if it was truly about the children, accusers, “victims” could have came out 10 years ago, or at least during the Biden administration…. I’m sure the Biden administration would of had no problem letting them wear their t-shirts. Here is your second change to address my point about the victims in danger no matter how the names come out….

You make a good point. @DCT seems to think the reason the “victims” won’t release the names themselves is out of fear for their life. If the DOJ releases the “list”, and they have enough evidence to prosecute, the “victims” will be 1st hand witnesses…..that would put them in the SAME danger as releasing the names themselves…. actually Matt, you just helped me prove my point, this is political….unless someone can explain why DOJ releasing the list would be safer for victims than them releasing the names.

Lol….so whoever may “kill them” is perfectly fine if they campaign with T-Shirts that say release the names, but they cross the line if THEY release the names😂 That does not pass the smell test for me….also some of the “victims” were adults at the time of their assault.

Really? All we know is what is being released. They(congress) are trying to interpret redacted emails, accusations from anonymous sources, etc…… a single do or don’t can change the meaning of a redacted document 100%. Allegations have plagued Trumps terms by Democrats….Russigate….

What if she was using it to collect evidence on Congress people that may be involved with the Epstein case? Would you be for or against that?