RETIREDFAN1

[Hidden Content]

^^^ that was Newton JV Saturday: West Hardin 15 Newton 10........

West Hardin 9, Newton 4........

Cancelled due to big sandys basketball game tonight..

West Hardin 14 Alpha Omega 5

[Hidden Content]

I voted last week......voted FOR Ted Cruz in the Presidential race......

One more clown in the trump clown car...........

Uranus......

I'm with Apple on this one........

West Hardin vs. San Augustine Tuesday at 8:00 Woodville

Don't give them any ideas........lol

That SECOND AMENDMENT is looking better and better......

All we have to have to keep his nominee out is 40........there are over 50 republicans in the Senate......if they can't block his nominee, there's no further reason to even bother voting for republicans ever again......

Not if the Senate grows a pair.......it takes 60 votes to approve a justice.......all the republicans have to do is say no......

Congrats to Coach West on a great career and hope she has a long and enjoyable retirement.......

You're probably right...I wasn't paying attention when they were talking about the time.......

The article is showing how contradictory man's law is when it tries to call one persons murder of an unborn child a crime, while calling it justified when done by a doctor.....evidently you guys don't understand satire.....he's showing how ludicrous and absurd it is to allow doctors to murder unborn children, when someone who is not a doctor would be prosecuted and imprisoned FOR DOING THE SAME THING....the article is 100% true...the only thing absurd is the fact that the genocide is allowed to continue........

West Hardin vs. West Sabine in Kirbyville on Tuesday........7:00......

Your statement of absolute faith in the judgement of the Supreme Court.......

The U. S. Supreme Court also ruled at one time that it was perfectly legal to own slaves and to transport them to your new home in the western states if you so chose...... .[Hidden Content]

I didn't have to look them up for any reason other than to post them.....IF your biographical information is correct, I've been studying The Constitution since before you were a twinkle in your parent's eyes....:P We seem to have different interpretations of it.....yours, based on the opinions of lawyers and courts...... mine based on the Founders own words in The Federalist and the Anti-Federalist papers, which are linked below for anyone interested in learning the Founders perspective...... [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]

It's STILL in question........I don't see any evidence backing up your claims.....you may be a burger flipper at Dairy Queen for all anyone on here knows......

You managed to LEAVE OUT the following clause: with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. here is the ENTIRE context of Article II, Section 2, unedited except for points of emphasis.....It doesn't say the same thing you edited it to say in order to back up your very wrong position.... Section 2 The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects. In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. I don't see any express statement forbidding state courts to hear the cases you mentioned, nor do I see anything that can even imply that state courts are forbidden to hearing those cases......

[Hidden Content]