bullets13 Posted April 10, 2014 Report Share Posted April 10, 2014 Personally speaking; if I was being taught or instructed by a man dressed as a woman I would have a hard time staying focused or giving the instructor the credibility deserved. JMO, right or wrong. have you seen pictures of the guy/girl? she really looks quite ordinary. i'd be pretty distracted if she came in dressed up like a drag queen, but from what i've seen in the media, i just don't see much there that is going to get the kids wound up. as for distractions, i know a teacher that weighs nearly 600 lbs. Should he be put before the board because he's a distraction? should good looking female teachers be put before the board because they're distractions? i remember in 5th or 6th grade we had a young, attractive teacher who wore tight, form hugging shirts, and it was generally quite obvious when it was cold in the room. she was dressed nice, she didn't show a bunch of cleavage or anything like that, but on most days most of the boys had their attention glued to the teacher, but i don't believe many of us heard what she was saying. all that to say, apart from maybe a temporary distraction, i'm having a hard time buying the argument, and it's even harder in light of the fact that this sub had apparently subbed there multiple times before without significant enough of a distraction for it to be brought up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted April 10, 2014 Report Share Posted April 10, 2014 How's the crowd at the admin building in Lumberton right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Leslie Rangel â€@LeslieKFDM 4m Speaker says LISD is teaching discrimination. Asks parents to turn off TV and Internet if they don't want children exposed. #LISD @kfdmnews Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Uhh ooohh. But she does have a point. If they fire her/him,then what are they teaching? Let'a see if the Lumberton administration drop the ball on this one... Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Hippy, by all means, please give is the 411. Surely, you're at the board meeting. Do spit it out. Because I see you still posting on the BISD thread tonight. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 This will be interesting..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Uhh ooohh. But she does have a point. If they fire her/him,then what are they teaching? Let'a see if the Lumberton administration drop the ball on this one... She has no point...so if it's on the internet or TV, we should allow it in the schools...smh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Hippy, by all means, please give is the 411. Surely, you're at the board meeting. Do spit it out. Because I see you still posting on the BISD thread tonight. Like I have said many times....unlike others, I don't get on here and defend my school district because they are like me....... I think they handled this completely wrong......Had I been in charge.... 1. If LISD decided we didn't want her back....I would have let her complete whatever schedule she had and not called her back (she is on a list with other subs) ...end of problem. 2. If LISD agreed she should teach, she would still be on the list and she could be called..... Note....there is no discrimination case according to the laws I have looked up.....but if they fire her, there will probably be a case and it may be a huge mistake for the district...... They should of handled it like I said and we wouldn't be having this conversation....... Oh yea......GO RAIDERS :D Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Like I have said many times....unlike others, I don't get on here and defend my school district because they are like me....... I think they handled this completely wrong......Had I been in charge.... 1. If LISD decided we didn't want her back....I would have let her complete whatever schedule she had and not called her back (she is on a list with other subs) ...end of problem. 2. If LISD agreed she should teach, she would still be on the list and she could be called..... Note....there is no discrimination case according to the laws I have looked up.....but if they fire her, there will probably be a case and it may be a huge mistake for the district...... They should of handled it like I said and we wouldn't be having this conversation....... Oh yea......GO RAIDERS :DNot bad, Hippy. I COMPLETELY agree. (which is not often with us. ;) ) thetragichippy and Mr. Buddy Garrity 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Well, except the 'go Raiders' part... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Well, except the 'go Raiders' part... HA! and thanx! BMTSoulja1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordibug15 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Well, except the 'go Raiders' part... Hey now!!! Watch it!!! thetragichippy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 I rise in defense of BMTSoulja on this issue. :D thetragichippy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Let me backtrack. It's Go Raiders when raidergirl is lurking... thetragichippy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 I rise in defense of BMTSoulja on this issue. :D:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatMack19 Posted April 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 People keep mentioning her/him being fired. Correct me if I'm wrong but subs are on a list and are called on an as needed basis and are not permanent employees of the district. They don't need to fire her/him, just don't call them anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigdog Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 You are correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 People keep mentioning her/him being fired. Correct me if I'm wrong but subs are on a list and are called on an as needed basis and are not permanent employees of the district. They don't need to fire her/him, just don't call them anymore. yes,,,but it appears LISD didn't want BISD hogging up all that free press, so they made it a controversial issue when it was a simple fix........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 yes,,,but it appears LISD didn't want BISD hogging up all that free press, so they made it a controversial issue when it was a simple fix........ Ha! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordibug15 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Let me backtrack. It's Go Raiders when raidergirl is lurking... It should always be Go Raiders :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordibug15 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 I rise in defense of BMTSoulja on this issue. :D =/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mat Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 I have already stated my view but here’s the real question. Why and how was (s)he hired? Was his gender and situation revealed prior to hiring? Did he mislead them during the hiring process? Did they know his situation and hire him anyway? If they hired him know he was a man who dressed and acted like woman then they should support their hire. If they were misled and the sub misrepresented himself they should quit using him as a sub. bullets13 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDOVE3 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 :D I feel like throwing up!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMTSoulja1 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 I have a weird feeling this is not over......... Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.